Think On These Things

Research, Commentary, and News on the 2008 Presidential Election with a Pro-Obama Slant

Video: Interviewer Picks The Wrong Obama Supporter to Try To Railroad

(h/t jackandjillpolitics)

Or based on how the interview ended, maybe he picked the right one.

Derrick makes me want to go read a newspaper or encyclopedia or something.

Also See:

This entry was posted on February 6, 2008 at 9:07 pm and is filed under Barack Obama, Democrats, Election 2008, Politics, Youtube. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

261 Responses to "Video: Interviewer Picks The Wrong Obama Supporter to Try To Railroad"

sagittarius Says:
February 6, 2008 at 9:41 pm
And "they" say young folk are apathetic!

And I say that's lazy thinking. It is fast becoming apparent that young folk have been engaged by this candidate - and this campaign - in a manner that can transform the American electorate for at least two generations.
lea Says:
February 6, 2008 at 10:06 pm
This interviewer definitely picked the wrong guy to try to make the point that Obama backers are not thoughtful Derrick did a great job. The interviewer had a preconceived notion that Derrick did not understand the issues and that he was moved to Obama by emotion instead of logic. Derrick owned him on the substance of the health care issue and the interviewers thesis was destroyed.
RandyK Says:
February 7, 2008 at 1:05 am
This is an awesome clip.

Derrick for VP!

Great suppoter of a great candidate.
Tanya Phelps Says:
February 7, 2008 at 1:11 am
FANTASTIC, DERRICK!

You are brilliant, well-versed, and an incredible example of what an Obama supporter looks like! =) BRAVO!
Kathleen Says:
February 7, 2008 at 1:24 am
You're brilliant Derrick! If I wasn't already married, I'd wanna date you!

You, like Obama, make me proud to be an American!
Kaylen Says:
February 7, 2008 at 1:25 am
Wow. Derrick, you absolutely ROCK!

Who on earth is the guy conducting the interview? - I agree with the others that he is a remarkable spokesperson for Obama!

As long as he doesn't actually vote for older-than-dirt "Weathervane McCain" and stays with Barack!
Erin Says:
February 7, 2008 at 1:54 am
I loved everything he had to say! The interviewer didn't expect what he got that's for sure. Now on the other hand I was at my caucus and the HRC supporters thought her Universal Healthcare Plan wouldn't cost them anything. I'm glad Obama supporters are educated on the brilliance of his plan and the fact it will bring bi-partisan support, unlike HRC's.
thefireman109 Says:
February 7, 2008 at 1:56 am
Heavy D, that dude needs to stop, drop and roll FOR REAL! You got straight-up profiled and you torched him. Call 911! Props to your peeps D. They brought you up straight and hard, baby. Way to represent. And for real, that McCain jab is the same way it's getting played right here in SoTEX, you just gotta sell it a little better. Because, for real…we can walk.

Go Barack!
Grow ObamaNation!
Joy Says:
February 7, 2008 at 2:15 am
I am sending this out to as many people as possible and I suggest you do the same. Derrick laid out the clear advantages of Obama's health care plan as opposed to Hillary's fairytale mandated health care plan.

We also don't want a situation similar to car insurance where some 30% still aren't covered because they can't afford it. We definitely don't want situations like Geico and All State where by they are constantly increasing premiums, leaving most people with inferior low budget insurance that will cover little.
sagereader Says:
February 7, 2008 at 6:26 am
"Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect," –I Peter 3:15

That's why I love Derrick's response so much.
gr8bluesgtr Says:
February 7, 2008 at 3:44 pm
I nominate Derrick for Vice President.
Marina Moonlight Says:
February 7, 2008 at 5:16 pm
Derrick- YOU ARE AWESOME!

Now you just have to teach Barack how to be more specific, so I don't have to keep informing the people I meet who say he HAS NO SUBSTANCE!

You gave the best explanation of how he will actually be able to accomplish his agenda when nobody else has been able to!

Derrick, do you think you'd be able to go for a 53 y.o. white woman? :>)
Lynn Q Says:
February 7, 2008 at 6:28 pm
Wow Derrick, I am both impressed and speechless by your amazing performance.
You just nip in the bud all racist preconceptions and misconceptions about young Blacks and about the enthusiastic support for Senator Obama's candidacy.

I am proud of all of us his supporters, because we are highly educated, well-informed, well-traveled, multilingual and multicultural people!!

Well done! Please share this video all over the world, with young kids and everyone.

P.S. The would-be not-so-subtle racist interviewer sure got his MATCH…
sdg1844 Says:
February 7, 2008 at 9:29 pm
It seems that by the end of the interview, the "condescension" on the part of the interviewer was finito. Nice work Derrick!
Julian Says:
February 8, 2008 at 2:16 am
Derrick was no doubt impressive, but he was factually inaccurate. First of all, there are significant differences between the three candidates. The major difference is that John Edwards led on the issues and forced his opponents to be more progressive than they originally intended to be. He presented the first and most progressive universal healthcare plan, global warming plan (his position to reduce carbon emissions by 80% was the standard for the Democratic agenda), middle class tax reform plan, government reform plan, education plan, a comprehensive poverty plan, and was the only candidate to propose a national predatory lending law, among other plans. You name it, he led on it He also presented an economic stimulus package two weeks before the Iowa Caucus, before the economy began to make a turn for the worse, and before the White House and both of his opponents. This is significant because it demonstrates the so-called "courage" that Obama has. If he didn't have the political conviction to presents plans just as agressive as Edwards', then he is likely to show the same lack of political conviction in governing as President. In fact, Obama has been the least progressive and specific on all of the issues. You can spin to your heart's content, but you cannot defend the economics of his health care plan. In a new paper released by Jonathan Gruber of MIT, one of the country's leading health care economists, he argues that the only effective way to attain full medical coverage is through mandates. Despite what Derrick said, Obama's plan does not involve a public-private partnership and his criticism of only government paying for the health care is inaccurate. In fact, both Clinton and Obama's plan provide for a government health care plan that competes with private insurers in order to bring down costs. Both provide subsidies for the purchase of care (and Clinton's are greater). The difference is, of course, in the mandates. Obama's plan covers only 23 million of the uninsured for 102 billion dollars. Clinton's (actually Edwards' plan; Clinton copied his, which was presented in February of last year outright; Clinton's was presented in October) plan covers 45 million, all of the uninsured, for 124 billion dollars. That amounts to $4700 per uninsured for Obama's plan compared to $2700 per uninsured for Clinton's plan. That sounds like to a huge difference to me. Besides, Obama's plan would actually exacerbate the problem of high health care costs, because without a mandate, people would be incentivized to only purchase health care when they get sick, thereby raising the premiums for everyone else. And he contradicts himself, because he actually considers penalizing those who delay signing up and provides a mandate for children. His plan is also not feasible politically, because once he realizes that the only way to achieve universal coverage is through mandates, he won't be able to because he spent his entire campaign demonizing them - even resorting to the same "Harry and Louise" like mailer ads to criticize Clinton's mandates; the same tactics used by the Conservatives and the health care industry to defeat the 1993-94 effort. And let's also not forget he has gotten disproportinately positive media coverage for a presidential candidate. . . positive coverage from the same media in which 80% of it is owned by Conservatives . . . the same media that served as the de facto communications office of the Bush administration. Which brings me to another significant difference, Edwards was the most electable. That is why his message got covered five to seven times less than the other candidates, why he got only 5% media coverage compared to 15% and 25% for Obama and Clinton following the Iowa Caucus according to Democracy Corps. He consistently beat Republicans by higher margins than the both of them, and when he was put on the top of the ticket, the advantage that Democratic incumbents in swing congressional districts had over their opponents increased, while it dropped precipitously for Obama and Clinton. So he was the main candidate who can build an electable Democratic coalition. I could go on and on, but I have a feeling this is all falling on deaf ears . . .
BryAnn Says:
February 8, 2008 at 2:56 am
It is falling on Positive and Hopeful ears… Ears that know: small differences in policy stances mean nothing. That Unity, Integrity and a President who will actually inspire, listen and include the PEOPLE in his decision making process means everything. I read a great quote (not exact I fear) "Listening is like giving love and people who are listened to can hardly tell the difference."

And DERRICK, your are amazing, inspiring, brilliant and a man that will make a positive and informed change in the world. Congratulations!
pat Says:
February 8, 2008 at 4:54 am
I want Derrick to run for public office! What a grasp he has on important issues, and how well he articulates them. I'm a lowly Sen. Obama campaign worker–envelope stuffer and door knocker. People like Derrick make me proud to be associated with this campaign. Keep the faith, folks.
William Says:
February 8, 2008 at 8:37 am
Find Derrick and send him to LA, WA, Tx and MD!
Shane Says:
February 8, 2008 at 9:14 am
Julian,

I'm a huge fan of Senator Edwards. I supported him in 2004. However, I would like to offer a different POV on many of the things you've suggested.

1. Edwards introduced detailed policy positions first because he's been running for President full time since 2003. Don't get me wrong, his proposals were impressive and clearly well thought-out. But comparing the timeline of the Edwards' campaign to that of Obama (or Clinton) is not an apples-to-apples comparison. To put it another way: Edwards introduced his candidacy for President in 2003 and introduced these policies in 2007. It's not as if we didn't need Health Care, Economic Stimulus, and a Global Warming plan in 2004. We did. It took him 4 years to introduce these policies. It took Obama (and Clinton) less than a year.

It's disingenuous of you to look over the fact that Edwards was a professional Presidential Candiate while Obama was affecting real change in the US Senate, passing ethics reform and standing with Senator Kennedy for comprehensive immigration reform.

2. You suggest that Edwards has more "political courage" than Obama because he released his proposals first. I suggest that you look at Senator Edwards' record in the US Senate. He voted FOR the patriot act. He voted FOR the 2001 bankruptcy law (along with Clinton). He voted FOR the China free trade deal. He voted FOR the usue of force in Iraq. He voted FOR NCLB.

Frankly, with all due respect to Senator Edwards, when he had a chance to directly effect the course of this country as just one of 100 US Senators, he chose again and again to take the EASY WAY OUT. It's EASY to rail against an unpopular law or an unpopular war. It's MUCH MORE DIFFICULT to stir the POLITICAL COURAGE to stand AGAINST the political tidal wave and resist these policy positions from day one.

And that's the kind of political courage you see from Senator Obama. No doubt, in 2002-3 he was already considering running for the US Senate. And at a time when everyone thought the war would be over in 2 weeks and Bush would spend all summer smiling in victory parades, at a time when NEARLY EVERY OTHER DEMOCRAT, including EDWARDS and CLINTON supported the war, Barack Obama was a lone voice of dissent.

3. Your characterization of Senator Obama's healthcare plan is just a complete distortion of the facts. And I suspect you KNOW that.

FACT: Personal Mandates Do Not Cover Everybody and Personal Mandates Do Not Reduce Costs.

The awesome part of this is that we have real evidence here. We have 10+ years of personal mandates for auto insurance in (nearly?) EVERY STATE IN THE UNION.

Yet, despite HARSH PENALTIES, we still have so many uninsured motorsist that we, as a law, must cover insurance just to protect against those that are uninsured.

Yet, despite COAST to COAST MANDATES, the cost of auto insurance, adjusted for inflation, has NEVER went down year over year.

But we make CRIMINALS out of those that don't purchase the insurance.

And HILLARY will do the same thing. National healthcare is NOT some abstract duty to divine providence. It's simply a MORAL issue. It's simply about HELPING THOSE THAT NEED HELP. It's a simple illustration that in this country WE ARE OUR BROTHERS KEEPER, and WE ARE OUR SISTERS KEEPER.

It's about HELPING people. And the way to help people is not to turn them into criminals!

Obama's plan is to institute nearly the EXACT SAME policy as Clinton and Edwards only it won't FORCE people to buy insurance that they simply cannot afford. It's to use the gov't health plan to compete with the private sector and push down costs for the first time in decades. Obama's plan is simple: Reduce costs and then cover everyone voluntarily.

Clinton's (and Edwards') plan is to cover everyone BY FORCE including GARNISHING WAGES, and THEN reduce costs.

Excuse me while I laugh and squirt milk out my nose. This has been tried. See Also: Insurance, Auto.

When people are FORCED BY LAW to purchase healthcare there is no longer ANY incentive for the private insurers to cut costs. NONE. They have a built in, forced market.

It is _MORALLY WRONG_ for the Government to force people to purchase insurance that they simply cannot afford.

And yes, Senator Clinton does TRY to make it more affordable by offering subsidies. Your comment that she offers "more" subsidies is patently wrong. First, the language in all these plans is purposely ambiguous about subsidies. Second, the words "more" or "less" simply do not apply. Senator Clinton does offer DIFFERENT subsidies, as does Obama and Edwards. Robert Reich, a former Clinton Labor Secretary has examined both Obama's plan and Clintons and determined that they will both offer coverage to the same amount of people, give or take.

Furthermore: More than one study has shown that there is a "Donut Hole" in Senator Clintons subsidies. This will create a large swath of people who CANNOT AFFORD insurance but will be FORCED to buy it by having their WAGES GARNISHED by HILLARY CLINTON. These are low and middle income folks who will have to cut spending elsewhere to cover these lost wages. What will they cut? What will they lose?

Finally, your characterization of Edwards as "most electable" was proven incorrect, I think. You claim he was the victim of a partisan MSM. Edwards was on the Democratic ticket in 2004. He was one of the last men standing in that news cycle. He was getting attention as a 2008 candidate starting November 5, 2004. You act like people just didn't know who he was or what he stood for. RUBBISH. People knew exactly what he stood for. The people spoke. It was NOT Clinton's fault. It was NOT Obama's fault. It was NOT the medias fault. It was NOT John Edwards' fault. It was just the way it is.

It just wasn't his time.

Finally, the notion that Edwards beat the GOP candidates by wider margins than other candidates is PATENTLY FALSE. Sure, there's no doubt that this is the case in a few polls. Edwards himself made that claim in one of his last debates. And THAT SAME NIGHT it was debunked by factcheck.org. In truth, he WAS beating the GOP candidates by more than the other 2 dems in the last CNN survey that matched the 3 democrats against the GOP Field.

The problem, however, is that Edwards made that statement in the middle of January. And the last CNN Poll that included all 3 was taken in the beginning of December, before Obama won Iowa and before Clinton won in New Hampshire. After that, CNN did not include Edwards in subsequent polls (they said they would begin including him again if he won a state). HUNDREDS of "horse race" polls have been conducted since 2007 and it's JUST A FLAT OUT LIE to suggest that Edwards' was the most competitive candidate in a plurality of them.

I do not mean to attack Senator Edwards. He was my #1 choice in 2004, and my #2 choice this year. He's set the tone of this race and he's brought issues of poverty to the front of this debate. The nation and the party owe him a debt of gratitude.

But i could simply NOT stand by while you distort the record of Senator Obama.

I hope you join the Senator for the remainder of the race. Senator Edwards himself made this a clear choice for you and your fellow supporters: There were 2 candidates for change in this race, and one candidate of the status quo. There is now only one candidate for change still standing.

Ask "WWJD": What Would John Do. Faced with these 2 candidates, I think it's pretty clear who Edwards himself will be voting for in the North Carolina primary.

Enjoy your Friday and have a great weekend!
W Broaden Says:
February 8, 2008 at 9:16 am
Derrick, would make an excellent, Lawyer! He took charge of the interview and knew the
subject matter…hands down!!! Great Job!!!
Lisa Says:
February 8, 2008 at 9:45 am
I'd vote for Derrick!
nic Says:
February 8, 2008 at 10:03 am
Obama should offer this guy a job!
Seattle ObamaMama Says:
February 8, 2008 at 10:45 am
WOW…what an excellent advocate for Obama and perfect example of how to debate effectively without being disagreeable. I just showed my two oldest sons (7 & 12 yo) this clip as a model for how to make your point in an intelligent mannner with the greatest chance to persuade the other party. Wish I could take Derrick with me to our caucus tomorrow! Way to Go!!!!!! 'YES WE CAN!' OBAMA 2008
Brian K. Hll Says:
February 8, 2008 at 10:47 am
I viewed Derrick's response to the reporter and I was impressed. I then felt sad because I would not have been able to articulate, communicate and convey the message as to why I really have jumped on board of supporting Barack Obama. My response would have been based on "emotion" and the inspiration I continue to have as I finally "Believe" we (African American Men) finally have a "Qualified" candidate in the Political arena that is a "Player" in this race in my life time.

I am ready to do more work and really learning about the issues that go beyond emotion. Derrick I appreciate your ability to think on your feet. Ting ready and his old geyser actually learn from Derrick that I need to go do my homework. Now I see why I am on Barack's Team I want to learn and take action after I learn the correct issues and get a grasp on how to articulate them.

The post I read from "Shane says" responding to "Julian says" was another inspiring read right after the YEAH! experience from viewing Derrick's video. I thought where do this people get there knowledge to respond in such detail?
After reading Shane's reply to Julian I felt like I was in a class and the listening to two students debate How to get your facts out on the table, the PRO and the Con of " Why I should support BaracK"? and "What was John Edward's contribution to the 2008 Presidential Race? Wow. You guys are amazing to know your positions so well.

Brian k. Hill
Castro Valley, CA
Shelley Says:
February 8, 2008 at 10:55 am
Derrick is an Awesome Obama Supporter!! And the MSM says that Obama Supporters are all caught up on a feeling. HA!! Most of us who are very strong supporters know his stance on the issues and the differences between them. Not to mention can breakdown more details than the MSM is willing to give credit to. That's why his stump speeches are geared to inspire and motivate people to get involved and then they want to know more about someone who can touch them deep in places that other traditional politicians have not and can not.

Big Kudos to you Derrick and the MANY Derricks to come!!

FIRED UP READY TO GO! SI SE PUEDE! YES WE CAN!! WINNING WITH OBAMA IN 2008!!!!!!!
Stacy (NJ) Says:
February 8, 2008 at 11:00 am
I Second "Derrick for VP". That was thee best Obama news I've seen today. I must admit, it started as a nailbiter for me. I was worried that Derrick's response would be an emotional appeal to vote for Sen. Obama as opposed to an interview that would talk about policies which affect us all. Derrick Blew Me Away!! He helped me (a very informed voter) better understand the issue of healthcare in America more than anyone to date. He spoke in a very down-to-earth, yet highly intelligent way. I owe ya' one Derrick, you've given me even more ammo!! Please get in touch w/Sen. Obama's campaign- he (and we) need you at the top of his movement!!! I also second his "don't sleep" idea, I just can't see any way to vote for Hillary and stay true to myself! It Won't Happen.

p.s. The second best news of today is a TIME poll released puts Obama at 48% to McCain's 41% in a general election and Hillary vs. McCain 46% to 46% (tied up).
Obama Supporter Says:
February 8, 2008 at 11:30 am
I support Obama for substantive reasons… It's Derrick I support for emotional reasons. His intelligence and poise gave me goose bumps!!
Byron Says:
February 8, 2008 at 11:33 am
Great job Derrick! Also, great job Shane. Your response to Julian's criticism was informed and well-written, polite but forceful. Well done.
KWALKER Says:
February 8, 2008 at 11:57 am
Derrick is obviously a free thinker whose mind was cultivated by great parenting and education. Though I most likely would not have been as pleasant with the interviewer, something must be said for the "Emotional" supporters of Obama (Present Company Included). The reality of most Americans is one of uncertainty, fear, dispair, and did I say fear. Yes FEAR, an EMOTION. An Emotion predicated by the very pointed and direct decisions of our 2 term President. So Emotionally, I need change and feel that Obama can galvanize the political Left and Right to bring about sustainable change in this Country. Thank You Derrick, and Thank you to the other EMOTIONAL supporters of Obama! KW Lithonia, G.A.
Joy Says:
February 8, 2008 at 1:21 pm
Shane,

I just want to thank you for bringing even more clarity. There are so many lies to debunk, so many people are basing there choices on misinformation and distortions. I will recommend to everyone that I come across in blogs, in person, those that I know see the video of Derrick, and read your most informative and intelligent rebuttal to Julian.

Thank you again,

Joy
DE for Obama Says:
February 8, 2008 at 4:31 pm
Absolutely first class! Derrick, your eloquence, poise and command of the issues–coupled with your refusal to be goaded into an argument by your confrontational interviewer–were breathtaking and, dare I say, inspirational!
Pearl Says:
February 8, 2008 at 4:50 pm
I am humbled by the response of such an awesome young man. I am one of those
emotional supporter of Barack and I am not ashamed of it. Barack bring the kind of
hope and pride that MLK brought. We all live in this world for sure. Yet at the same
time, we live in different realities. Derrick speaks for those of us who cannot articulate in manner. I am not concern how the media label some of us as emotional.
We are not all the same. Its like the human body. Each part has it particular job to do.
Julian Says:
February 8, 2008 at 7:28 pm
Shane,
I appreciate your detailed and well thought out response. But I respectfully submit that you are once again distorting facts in defense of Sen. Obama.

1. First of all, Obama and Clinton presented plans conspicuously very similary to Edwards' months after he presented his. My point was that they were not going to be nearly as progressive as Edwards was until he came out with his policies. His policies set the entire Democratic policy agenda. Now don't you think that it important for a presidential candidate to define what the state of the country is,
what it needs to be, and the strategy and specific ideasvneeded to get there. A presidential candidate's ability to correctly answer those questions are crucial to not onlyhis electability, but his capacity to govern effectively. And Senator Obama did not do this correctly. He pretty much took centrist positons at a time when the country is more to the left. Party Identification is 50%-36% in favor of Democrats according to the Pew Research Center (largest gap in the history of Pew's Party ID Poll). The Republicans are more unpopular than they have been in the past 40 years. And don't get me started on the policy failure of the Bush administration. Edwards' ability to define a message that resonates with where the country is and where it needs to go (such as Reagan and Clinton with their focus on the economy) is indicative of his ability to have been able to govern effectively as President. Senator Obama's general message of bringing people together and hope and that other stuff was an offshoot of his 2004 DNC speech. It didn't speak directly to the growing economic inequality of the country due to the exorbitant influence copororations have on our democracy., And you're right, Edwards, following the 2004 election, did grassroots work with his charitable efforts setting up a College for Everyone program, working in Katrina relief, and establishing a poverty center where he could engage in and understand the most pressing issues facing the country in order to build an aggressive and progressive yet pragmatic policy agenda that would tackle the country's biggest problems and that was politically feasible. Obama was ambivalent about running for President at first. He believed (correctly) that his consistently positive media coveragewas anomalous to anyone seriously considering running for President and would only set too high of expectations for his candidacy that would be a politicalliability. So instead, he pledged to fulfill his entire Senate term. Now, I don't know what was going through his mind when he all of a sudden decided to run for President, but I could imagine that constant media speculation about his entering (and including him in early presidential polls) had some influence
on his decision since it proved that his candidacy would be viable. And just
like that, he neglected his first instincts and entered the race. This is
problematic for two reasons. First of all, it demonstrates his tenuous
political instincts – that he is susceptible to having his convictions undermined by incorrect and sometimes frivolous advice and evidence. I'll say it once again - the same institution that gave him unprecedented positive media coverage also propped up the Bush administration and is owned by conservatives. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 deregulated the telecommunications industry allowing for the formation of media monopolies. Now 8 conglomerates own the entire MSM, making 80% of the MSM conservative.

2. Now, let's have a discussion of Obama's ability to "effect real change in the U.S. Senate." That worthless ethics reform bill was fine, if it had done anything meaningful to, I don't know, reform ethics. It provided a google like search engine for pork projects of Congressman. He was unable to get a creation of a non-partisan institution to serve as oversight for congressional ethics. On top of that, his plan was not as nearly progressive or effective as Edwards, which would have outright ban lobbyists from supporting campaigns, created a universal system of public financing, and created a Citizen's Congress. Now, you mentioned Sen. Edwards' votes, but you didn't bother to talk about how Sen. Obama voted for the reauthorization of the Patriot Act, voted for the funding of the Iraq War (and campaigned for pro-war Congressional Democrats), vote for the confirmation of Condoleeza Rice, voted for the 2005 Energy Bill, which was written by the oil companies from Cheney's BS Energy Commission
sagereader Says:
February 8, 2008 at 7:58 pm
Just to interject…

I think we can all agree that Barack Obama has written and gotten signed into law more progressive legislation in his lifetime than has John Edwards…

and that Obama's record is more progressive than Clinton, McCain, and Huckabee, the three remaining major Presidential candidates.

I hope that means that we can all agree that he should be our next President.
JC Says:
February 8, 2008 at 8:18 pm
PEOPLE! I'm talking to anyone that can read this. You must remember one thing… education is the one thing that cannot be taken from you! You must know, we have to continue to be on our "A" game at all times, and that's what Derrick has illustrated. He has made me proud to not only be African American, but proud to be an educated African American. Just havintg a degree doesn't make you educated, it's carrying the torch from one pilar to the next. Carrying your dreams from one venture to the next. Carrying your successes to one generation to the next. I would imagine, Derrick made many of us feel bad that we've not kept up with as much as thought we had. Let's do better…one day at a time, but with duly noted progress.

JC (LA-ATL-JAX)
Julian Says:
February 8, 2008 at 8:49 pm
My bad . . . allow me to continue . . .
2. - and he did it because of his contributor from Exelon who supports nuclear energy. Also, he voted for a provision in the 2005 Bankruptcy Bill (by the way, the 2001 Bankruptcy Bill DIDN'T pass; the 2005 one did, though) that eliminated a 36% cap on credit card interest rates (due in large part because credit card executives fundraised for his 2004 Senate campaign). He also voted for the Peru Free Trade Deal. And let's not forget his actively protesting Ronald Reagan in college to now commending him as a"transformative political figure" without bemoaning his policies. Now back to his so-called agressive stance against the war. When he was running for the Senate, he himself admitted that he would not have know how he would have voted if he were in the Senate. And his voting record in the Senate as far as funding went was identical to those same Democrats he criticized for supporting the war. Now, I wholeheartedly agree with you about Sen. Edwards' problematic centrist record in the Senate. And I'll do you one better and say he didn't do much along the lines of actually passing meaningful legislation. But the difference between he and Obama is that Edwards learned his lesson and evolved into a more progressive candidate at a time when the country is more progressive economically, while Obama de-evolved and abandoned his progressive stances for more centrist, patronizing positions to the right when the country is moving to the left! A Democracy Corps survey asked people what was the biggest problem of the country. An overwhelming majority said that the country is moving in the wrong direction because big corporations get to do whatever they want. That sounds pretty familiar - like, I don't know, Edwards' overall message. I am not saying Obama lacks political courage, but I am saying he lacks it now that he is running for President. And that doesn't have to be the case when the country embraces such populism - which brings his so-called stellar judgment into question.
3. So now we have come to the issue of health care. Now, I will admit Shane, you would have got me, if your argument had been based on HEALTH ECONOMICS rather than the erroneous comparison to the auto insurance industry. My last post about the difference in their plans was based on research done by the leading health economists (Robert Reich is a LABOR economist by the way) in the country - including John Gruber of MIT and a study commissioned by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in 2003 - mandates are the most effective mechanism for covering the uninsured and for cost control - PERIOD! And by the way, if you actually read Sen. Edwards' health care plan - http://www.johnedwards.com/about/issues/health-care-overview.pdf - you would realize that the mandate is not imposed until the Health Care Markets and the government plan are established, Medicaid and SCHIP are expanded, tougher regulations on the insurance industry are included, and the new tax credits and subsidies are done to reign in the cost of health care. And your argument about forcing people who can't afford it purchase health insurance is blatantly false - because he clearly states he provides exemptions for financial hardship. But like I said, the factual economics are on my side. And besides, there have never been mandates for health care implemented, so don't knock it until it has been tried. But let's take the economics of it off of the table and look at it from a political perspective. You don't see how you, Derrick, and other Obama supporters have fallen right into the Republicans' trap. Now, you, I, Sen. Obama, and his supporters agree completely about the moral necessity for universal health care. But you and Derrick and Sen. Obama, in the same breath, contradict yourselves by using the Republican talking points that mandates are "morally wrong" and only equate to "socialized medicine" where the government "forces" forces people to buy health insurance. And don't even get me started on those "Harry and Louise" like mailers the Obama campaign sent out criticizing Clinton's health care plan. The mandate issue is politically precarious for Obama because it weakens his argument for universal healthcare. The Republicans will criticize Sen. Obama as a waffler who prevericates on the issue of mandates; because as a state senator, he was in favor of a single-payer health insurance system (a position that two-thirds of Americans actually support according to an MSNBC poll last year). In fact, Obama's position will allow the Republicans to possibly own the health care issue because he doesn't support mandates either, so they will say they have always held that position, so there plan is better. So his health care plan, economically and politically are simply not feasible.

3. On the point of electability - check out the Rasmussen Report Polls - http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/favorables/election_2008_democratic_candidates_running_in_2008_presidential_election. We obviously agree on the facts of that December CNN poll. I have looked at all the polls, and Sen. Edwards outperformed Sens. Clinton and Obama against Republicans in head-to-head matchups even though he was third in national polls against them. You can call it an outright lie if you want, but it is fact. In the Rasmussen Report polls, Mcain beats both Obama and Clinton, while Edwards beats McCain. And don't you find it convenient that CNN put him out of the polls. I mean, it couldn't have hurt to consider him just in case he won one. He was still in the race as far as I remember. But anyways, in addition to Edwards always outperforming Clinton and Obama in head-to-head matchups with Republicans nationally and in crucial swing and Southern states, there is also the issue of congressional elections. Because a presidential election also involves a candidate who is the strongest at the top of the ticket to increase the congressional majorities of his respective party. In a survey done (I have to go find it in my computer so just trust me on this one) last year, when Obama or Clinton were put on the top of the ticket for a Democratic congressional incumbent in rural Missouri who was leading the Republican by 20 points, that candidates lead dropped down to 6 points. It went up to 30 points when Edwards was put at the top of the ticket. Besides, Clinton and Obama perform poorly in rural areas (I am not talking about Obama's ability to win rural Democrats during this primary, I am talking about AGAINST Republicans), and the Democrats ability to win back the Congress in 2006 was because of the ability to produce populist, socially moderate Democratic candidates who could compete in rural congressional districts (where they made the most of their gains). A socially moderate, rural, populist candidate . . . now I wonder which one of them fit that mold . . . . And by the way, be weary of Obama's ability to outperform McCain now in these head to head polls. Remember, all the studies have shown that Obama has gotten unprecedented positive media coverage for a presidential candidate, so of course the polls will reflect this. But wait until the conservative-owned media starts to vet him seriously . . . Rezko, his middle name of Hussein, his controversial church (I know this is all propaganda by the way, but the American public doesn't), his waffling on the issues . . . And let's not underestimate this Clinton-Obama divide in the Democratic Pary. Because both Democratic
candidates, due to their divisive, identity-charged feud, have the potential of
being at the helm of slightly disenchanted, unenthused Democratic Party. Either
of them getting the nomination has the potential to alienate a crucial sector of
the Democratic coalition. If Clinton wins, then African-Americans,
Independents, and some upperclass Democrats may potentially stay at home come
election day. If Obama wins, Latinos (he only got 52% of the Latino vote in his own state, and remember, McCain will do well with Latinos because of comprehensive immigration reform), traditional, white working-class Democrats, and women won't be that enthused to vote. It is going to be hard for the wounds that Clinton and Obama's feud caused to heal that easily. And Edwards was the only hope of rebuilding an electable Democratic coalition, because none of those voters voted AGAINST him, they only voted for Obama and Clinton.

Now, Shane, let me say that I know my criticisms may sound a bit acerbic, but I am doing this for a purpose. First of all, I am trying to demonstrate how the Conservative Establishment through the MSM have a stranglehold on this Democracy and are able to manipulate the Democratic election . Check this out: http://www.johnedwards.com/whereisjohn/ - It shows how John Edwards did get less media coverage, 5% compared to 15% and 25% for Obama and Clinton following the Iowa Caucus according to the Project for Excellence in Journalism. Also, the Daily Kos, who is supporting Obama, actually has a bunch of research which conclusively shows that Edwards was marginalized by the MSM (with the exception of the mention of the $400 haircuts, being labeled as an "angry populist," and a hypocrite showing his house like there was a hostage situation taking place there). It may not seem like it, but I actually like Obama. It's just that I am disappointed in him. I am disappointed him because he has not lived up to his full potential. He was a briliant, politically savvy, and progressive politician who had the capacity to bring consensus on issues without sacrificing conviction. The problem is that he made the common political error of changing so much in order to make political gains that he lost the good qualities he already had. He is the one who is simply not ready to be President for that and because he second guessed himself on what really was wrong with the country and what it took to take care of it. The purpose of these posts are to address these issues so hopefully you, his campaign, and his other supporters will seriously think about these things in order to rectify them before the general election. Because if you think I am bad, can you imagine what the Republican attack machine is cooking up. I hope all is well, I appreciate your response, and I hope you have a great weekend, also!
- Julian
Bob, Florida - RFO Says:
February 8, 2008 at 9:33 pm
Wow, it's funny to read some of the "policy wonks" try and differentiate the minor details!! We all know that the reporter figured he had someone he could bluff!

When we sweep to power in November we will bring progressive congressmen with us because the voice of the people is the power of America!

I am sure you have seen this before, at least I hope so: "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union …???

What is so wrong with believing in someone who inspires you to do better and contribute to the political process???

Leadership is the process of influencing others in such a manner as to accomplish the mission.

Excellent job Derrick!

Go Barack '08
Jenny Says:
February 8, 2008 at 11:48 pm
Derrick, you nailed it! Way to represent the younger vote in an informed and assertive manner!!! Thank you!
Julian Says:
February 9, 2008 at 12:32 am
My bad . . . allow me to continue . . .
2. - and he did it because of his contributor from Exelon who supports nuclear energy. He voted for the business friendly Tort Reform Bill. Also, he voted for a provision in the 2005 Bankruptcy Bill (by the way, the 2001 Bankruptcy Bill DIDN'T pass; the 2005 one did, though) that eliminated a 36% cap on credit card interest rates (due in large part because credit card executives fundraised for his 2004 Senate campaign). He also voted for the Peru Free Trade Deal. And let's not forget his actively protesting Ronald Reagan in college to now commending him as a"transformative political figure" without bemoaning his policies. Now back to his so-called agressive stance against the war. When he was running for the Senate, he himself admitted that he would not have know how he would have voted if he were in the Senate. And his voting record in the Senate as far as funding went was identical to those same Democrats he criticized for supporting the war. Now, I wholeheartedly agree with you about Sen. Edwards' problematic centrist record in the Senate. And I'll do you one better and say he didn't do much along the lines of actually passing meaningful legislation. But the difference between he and Obama is that Edwards learned his lesson and evolved into a more progressive candidate at a time when the country is more progressive economically, while Obama de-evolved and abandoned his progressive stances for more centrist, patronizing positions to the right when the country is moving to the left! A Democracy Corps survey asked people what was the biggest problem of the country. An overwhelming majority said that the country is moving in the wrong direction because big corporations get to do whatever they want. That sounds pretty familiar - like, I don't know, Edwards' overall message. I am not saying Obama lacks political courage, but I am saying he lacks it now that he is running for President. And that doesn't have to be the case when the country embraces such populism - which brings his so-called stellar judgment into question.
3. So now we have come to the issue of health care. Now, I will admit Shane, you would have got me, if your argument had been based on HEALTH ECONOMICS rather than the erroneous comparison to the auto insurance industry. My last post about the difference in their plans was based on research done by the leading health economists (Robert Reich is a LABOR economist by the way) in the country - including John Gruber of MIT and a study commissioned by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in 2003 - mandates are the most effective mechanism for covering the uninsured and for cost control - PERIOD! And by the way, if you actually read Sen. Edwards' health care plan -on his website - you would realize that the mandate is not imposed until the Health Care Markets and the government plan are established, Medicaid and SCHIP are expanded, tougher regulations on the insurance industry are included, and the new tax credits and subsidies are done to reign in the cost of health care. And your argument about forcing people who can't afford it purchase health insurance is blatantly false - because he clearly states he provides exemptions for financial hardship. But like I said, the factual economics are on my side. And besides, there have never been mandates for health care implemented, so don't knock it until it has been tried. But let's take the economics of it off of the table and look at it from a political perspective. You don't see how you, Derrick, and other Obama supporters have fallen right into the Republicans' trap. Now, you, I, Sen. Obama, and his supporters agree completely about the moral necessity for universal health care. But you and Derrick and Sen. Obama, in the same breath, contradict yourselves by using the Republican talking points that mandates are "morally wrong" and only equate to "socialized medicine" where the government "forces" forces people to buy health insurance. And don't even get me started on those "Harry and Louise" like mailers the Obama campaign sent out criticizing Clinton's health care plan. The mandate issue is politically precarious for Obama because it weakens his argument for universal healthcare. The Republicans will criticize Sen. Obama as a waffler who prevericates on the issue of mandates; because as a state senator, he was in favor of a single-payer health insurance system (a position that two-thirds of Americans actually support according to an MSNBC poll last year). In fact, Obama's position will allow the Republicans to possibly own the health care issue because he doesn't support mandates either, so they will say they have always held that position, so there plan is better. So his health care plan, economically and politically are simply not feasible.

3. On the point of electability - check out the Rasmussen Report Polls. We obviously agree on the facts of that December CNN poll. I have looked at all the polls, and Sen. Edwards outperformed Sens. Clinton and Obama against Republicans in head-to-head matchups even though he was third in national polls against them. You can call it an outright lie if you want, but it is fact. In the Rasmussen Report polls, Mcain beats both Obama and Clinton, while Edwards beats McCain. And don't you find it convenient that CNN put him out of the polls. I mean, it couldn't have hurt to consider him just in case he won one. He was still in the race as far as I remember. But anyways, in addition to Edwards always outperforming Clinton and Obama in head-to-head matchups with Republicans nationally and in crucial swing and Southern states, there is also the issue of congressional elections. Because a presidential election also involves a candidate who is the strongest at the top of the ticket to increase the congressional majorities of his respective party. In a survey done (I have to go find it in my computer so just trust me on this one) last year, when Obama or Clinton were put on the top of the ticket for a Democratic congressional incumbent in rural Missouri who was leading the Republican by 20 points, that candidates lead dropped down to 6 points. It went up to 30 points when Edwards was put at the top of the ticket. Besides, Clinton and Obama perform poorly in rural areas (I am not talking about Obama's ability to win rural Democrats during this primary, I am talking about AGAINST Republicans), and the Democrats ability to win back the Congress in 2006 was because of the ability to produce populist, socially moderate Democratic candidates who could compete in rural congressional districts (where they made the most of their gains). A socially moderate, rural, populist candidate . . . now I wonder which one of them fit that mold . . . . And by the way, be weary of Obama's ability to outperform McCain now in these head to head polls. Remember, all the studies have shown that Obama has gotten unprecedented positive media coverage for a presidential candidate, so of course the polls will reflect this. But wait until the conservative-owned media starts to vet him seriously . . . Rezko, his middle name of Hussein, his controversial church (I know this is all propaganda by the way, but the American public doesn't), his waffling on the issues . . . And let's not underestimate this Clinton-Obama divide in the Democratic Pary. Because both Democratic
candidates, due to their divisive, identity-charged feud, have the potential of
being at the helm of slightly disenchanted, unenthused Democratic Party. Either
of them getting the nomination has the potential to alienate a crucial sector of
the Democratic coalition. If Clinton wins, then African-Americans,
Independents, and some upperclass Democrats may potentially stay at home come
election day. If Obama wins, Latinos (he only got 52% of the Latino vote in his own state, and remember, McCain will do well with Latinos because of comprehensive immigration reform), traditional, white working-class Democrats, and women won't be that enthused to vote. It is going to be hard for the wounds that Clinton and Obama's feud caused to heal that easily. And Edwards was the only hope of rebuilding an electable Democratic coalition, because none of those voters voted AGAINST him, they only voted for Obama and Clinton.

Now, Shane, let me say that I know my criticisms may sound a bit acerbic, but I am doing this for a purpose. First of all, I am trying to demonstrate how the Conservative Establishment through the MSM have a stranglehold on this Democracy and are able to manipulate the Democratic election . ]Edwards did get less media coverage, 5% compared to 15% and 25% for Obama and Clinton following the Iowa Caucus according to the Project for Excellence in Journalism. Also, the Daily Kos, who is supporting Obama, actually has a bunch of research which conclusively shows that Edwards was marginalized by the MSM (with the exception of the mention of the $400 haircuts, being labeled as an "angry populist," and a hypocrite showing his house like there was a hostage situation taking place there). It may not seem like it, but I actually like Obama. It's just that I am disappointed in him. I am disappointed him because he has not lived up to his full potential. He was a briliant, politically savvy, and progressive politician who had the capacity to bring consensus on issues without sacrificing conviction. The problem is that he made the common political error of changing so much in order to make political gains that he lost the good qualities he already had. He is the one who is simply not ready to be President for that and because he second guessed himself on what really was wrong with the country and what it took to take care of it. The purpose of these posts are to address these issues so hopefully you, his campaign, and his other supporters will seriously think about these things in order to rectify them before the general election. Because if you think I am bad, can you imagine what the Republican attack machine is cooking up. I hope all is well, I appreciate your response, and I hope you have a great weekend, also!
- Julian
Ian Says:
February 9, 2008 at 1:14 am
I think this sort of interview is a strong indication that Obama needs to articulate his stances in the same way Derrick did.

Obama's one major weakness (aside from lacking direct federal experience, which he has no control over), is his vagueness.

Obama just needs to work the specifics into the emotion. Whenever I hear him do that, I start wanting to support him unconditionally. He has good plans, good ideas on his website - he just needs to articulate them outside of debates.
Ian Says:
February 9, 2008 at 1:15 am
Julian - you need to put spaces in your writing and get to the point quicker. These are comments, not doctoral dissertations.

just a suggestion.
Julian Says:
February 9, 2008 at 1:45 am
Oh, you don't like that, huh, Ian . . . you know President Bush's staunches supporters were allergic to FACTS, too. If I had have kissed Obama's a** in that email it would have been more like a romance novel than a dissertation. Here's a suggestion for you - take two running jumps and go to hell. And while you're at it, do some research . . .
sagereader Says:
February 9, 2008 at 5:44 am
Julian, why are you making a case for John Edwards when he is no longer in the race?
Jonathon Says:
February 9, 2008 at 2:48 pm
Mandates don't work.

The Health Care argument can be boiled down to what Michael Moore (the "Sicko" movie guy) said on Larry King a couple days ago. Paraphrasing: he said there is no meaningful difference between the Obama and Clinton health plans because neither is single payer. This means that costs can't be controlled because the for-profit insurance companies are in the middle of the whole thing. Neither plan can work in practice because the costs will spiral out of control, or the insurance will be so weak that it is practically useless.

Fact 1: The Massachusetts plan, with mandates, has still missed half of the uninsured citizens. The MA plan doesn't have strong minimum coverage and quality requirements, so the half that are newly covered could have terrible plans. And, now the MA budget is busted so they need to figure out something.

Fact 2:, The CA health insurance proposal with mandates just went down in flames with only 1 of 11 votes, so it didn't even get out of the committee.

Fact 3: Listen very carefully to Clinton; she knows how to parse her language. In the debates and on the stump she says mandates are her starting point "goal". She has left plenty of room to abandon them so that a bill actual gets passed.

Fact 4: Obama is telling people the truth and now I support him. The best way to push health care is for Obama to win big in Nov. The two problems are political will and financial reality.

P.S. Julian the NYT article about Exelon was a hatchet job, it is rebuked point by point in the fact check part of the Obama website. While your at it you can read all the other corrections on that website. Like you said "do some research."
Julian Says:
February 9, 2008 at 4:28 pm
Sagereader, I am not making the case for JRE. I am explaining how he was the best and most electable Democratic nominee who conveniently got railroaded bythe conservative-owned MSM for the two less progressive, less electable, "celebrity candidates." And once again Democrats allow this to happen. This happened in 2004, when, before the Iowa Caucus, in head-to-head polls against President Bush, JRE was leading Bush by 11 points, Kerry tied him, and Dean lost by 3 points. The Republicans began to focus their attacks on Kerry to make Dems think that they were most afraid of him, and let's not forget the "John Kerry is Electable" story that they ran consistently. Kerry wins Iowa, and the rest is history. As an Obama supporter, you have to consider these things if you want your candidate to win the nomination and the presidency, because how can he change the politics of this country if that same politics was responsible for his existence and persistence as a national political figure. And Jonathon, I know the truth hurts, but you have to deal with it one way or the other. First of all, the MA plan is doing better than what is reported, but the reason why it misses half the uninsured is not because of the problem of enforcing mandates, it is because of the state hasn't allocated enough money for the subsidies for low-income people; and as you mentioned it won't be happening anytime soon with the budget shortfall. But let's look at mandates for COUNTRIES. It works in Switzerland and the Netherlands. I am not saying this to disagree with you; and I am saying what the leading healthcare economists in the country are saying. Obama is on the wrong side of the issue politically because not only does he not agree with mandates, but he uses the same talking points of "the government forcing people to buy healthcare" and socialized medicine that the Republicans use. Therefore, he gives them ownership of the issue. Besides, you claim he has so much courage, yet he should not include mandates in his healthcare plan, which is the most effective way to attain universal coverage, because he fears it may not get passed? That is what you call political courage. And he flew on the owner of Exelon's plane. But since I need to do some research, I urge you to please respond to the other things I mentioned about his votes in the U.S. Senate. As I do my research, feel free to respond to the other points that I made. I hope all is well.
Bill Says:
February 9, 2008 at 5:35 pm
Julian, you say Obama is politically on the wrong side of the healthcare issue. Yet, he continues to push his plan because he believes it to be best for the country. Isn't that political courage?
Jonathon Says:
February 9, 2008 at 6:28 pm
Julian,

Step back for a minute. You are vehemently fighting to maintain a system that keeps the existing special interests in place. And, you want to send them even more business via a government mandate.

The truth is that mandates without cost controls are unworkable. The government can't afford good coverage when the system leaves the insurance companies in place. The only way to deal with costs is to do single payer. Until then Obama's plan is just as good as any other. All the candidates have the same ideas about cost savings. But these ideas will not result in savings that can successfully limit costs. E.g. there are already all kinds of electronic record systems that are being used (where they make financial sense). And there are plenty of providers that don't use electronic systems (where they may not make financial sense). And, medical providers are often changing their systems. And there are hardware incompatibilities. And, there can be very high hardware and training costs whenever a change is implemented. And, trying to introduce large scale compatibility would be extraordinarily difficult, or more likely impossible. In other words, you should be skeptical when you here about billions of dollars being saved thanks to electronic records, or anything else.

Edwards, Clinton and Obama are truly on the same page, none of them deal with the increasing costs. The mandate issue is a political ploy; it is not financially viable if you want good coverage (MA and CA have shown that). And, I have no doubt that all the politicians (including Edwards and Obama) know it, even if they won't admit it. The only way to solve the skyrocketing cost of health care is some version of single payer.

By the way, I've been a hard core Republican who just got back from a caucus where I supported Obama in Washington (my precinct was 91 Obama, 20 Clinton). I'm sure you'll never support Obama, but he has me espousing the benefits of a single payer system. So, I would advise you to give some credit to the idea of transformational politics. Even I can see that Bush has been a disaster, so I'm supporting new leadership from Obama.

Of course I will acknowledge that Obama does have an up hill battle against Clinton. So, you can take comfort in that.

P.S. Thanks for not calling me out where I used "your" instead of "you're" in my last post.
sagereader Says:
February 9, 2008 at 6:33 pm
Julian, if John Edwards and Hillary Clinton had not gotten caught on mic early in the campaign season trying to conspire to keep lower-tier candidates out of the debates, maybe I'd be more open to complaints about his level of media coverage.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwgLlDbwNwU
Julian Says:
February 9, 2008 at 9:17 pm
Hey Jonathon,
I completely agree with you about mandates being unworkable without cost controls. The only problem with your argument is that all three plans, though Edwards (and de facto Clinton's because she copied his almost verbatim) is the strongest, have effective cost control mechanisms. In addition to electronic records and greater investment in preventative care and healthy lifestyles to create, their plans create a government healthcare plan that competes with private insurers in order to lower costs. Like I said, Edwards Health Care Markets were the strongest on this; he even said that the public private competition (which you as Republican could probably admit that competition would drive down costs), because of the strength of his government plan, would drive health care costs down dramatically and probably evolve into a single payer system. Check out his plan on his website while it is still available (can't post the address, otherwise they won't post this). And Jonathan, it's not that I don't agree with transformation politics, of the FACT that Obama has inspired people who were previously apathetic and had never been engaged in politics, my point is that that in himself won't win him the presidency, because part of the reason why he has inspired people to come into politics in order to change it is because of the politics he want to change. In particular, the MSM has fueled the flames of the Obama phenomenon, and all I am saying is proceed with caution, because these are the same people that fueled the flames of the Bush Adminstration's polices, and the country got burned because of it. But hey, I tend to be a bit of conspiracy theorist. No problem, Jonathan. And Bill, I said that Obama was on the wrong side of the issue both politically and ecnomocially. He is taking a political risk for the wrong issue. And no problem, Jonathan, about your errors. Thank you for not calling me out about my completely incoherent and excessively loquacious posts. LOL! I hope all is well!
- Julian
Rin Says:
February 9, 2008 at 9:28 pm
A very intelligent reply by Derrick. I am so happy I saw it.

I am an African American female, but Derrick doesn't make me proud to be black, neither does Obama. In fact, I am no more prouder of being black than I am of being a southpaw.

My beliefs and my actions make me who I am, not my race and my gender. Derrick makes me proud because he supports Barack, like I do, but he, unlike myself, I am ashamed to say, is well informed on the issues. Instead of pumping my fist into the air and shouting, "YEAH, MAN. YOU STICK IT TO DA MAN!" My first reaction when I saw this video was, "I need to educate myself–right now!" I am proud of Derrick because helped me realize weaknesses in the motives behind my choices.

I am proud of Obama because he has shown me that visionaries still exist, and that transformation is not only possible but crucial.

I appreciate Julian for bringing an intelligent argument to the table. And as long as we treat each other civilly and respect each other's ideas, we can make considerable progress in this country. The nuts and bolts of government are important, but it's not pieces of legislation that make a country great, it's the people. We have forgotten that over the last eight years. We had been led by our government to believe that we didn't need to know all the details, that our policy makers knew what was best for us, and the right pieces of paper and the right written words was enough to satisfy the growing resignation and restlessness among the people. I think this is why so many misinterpreted their anger for Clinton's MLK remark, not as a slight against King, which it wasn't, but because of the suggestion within it the overriding power of politicians versus the people. I'm sure this isn't what she meant, but I can see someone interpreting it that way.

Maybe Obama isn't the most "courageous" or the most "progressive" in terms of policy, but he has demonstrated courage in an emotional space people had not visited in a long time: the belief in oneself to affect change in the relationship with her neighbor, her community, her government,, but most importantly, within herself. I would like to start, first, by changing my attitude toward Clinton supporters, republicans, and the general smear consensus that Obama supporters are cultists and scary fanatics. There is no need to foam at the mouth when met with opposition. The more educated you are on the issues the more confident you'll be and the more respectful the debate. No longer do I expect to change someone's mind, just to know and explain my own. We human beings have a lifetime of self improvement to work on before we can even attempt to change someone else.

As Obama supporters we must remember that it's just like Derrick said, one man can't do everything. The burden is on us to live up to the message. If we truly can, then let's do it.
Jonathon Says:
February 10, 2008 at 3:25 pm
Julian,

I'm prone to getting in the weeds—and it's obvious that you have a strong interest in details. But, we can't forget that we're talking about campaign proposals. The machinations of the legislative process are guaranteed to result in substantial changes. Of much greater importance, it is impossible to predict how health care proposals will actually impact the country once implemented (just look at what has happened in MA).

That said, let the hypothetical prognosticating begin:

The Democrats' cost savings strategies don't include insurmountable differences. It is completely plausible that each candidate (including Obama) could argue that their approach is the best. In fact most of the differences are compatible or interchangeable. In other words, these things can be worked out. Further, in practice, none of the plans will have a big impact on the escalating cost of health care, because they all side step the single payer solution.

The competition you're talking about could very well back fire. What if the private plans are tailored so that they use deductable, actuarial, and other "creative" criteria so they can focus on the citizens that leave them with the highest profit margins? That leaves the high cost people left with the government plan, which jumps the cost of the government plan, which means less people can afford it. You could see health care costs go down for the people who already have it, but the costs could go up for the uninsured. To add insult to injury a mandate will charge a fee to the uninsured even if they can't afford health care, so they could pay a fine, but they still won't have health care (as in MA). And subsidizes aren't a realistic answer because they don't (and financially can't) cover people with moderate, but not low, incomes even though health care is prohibitively expensive for these supposedly well off families.

Of coarse the proponents for mandates say that we need to take money from the young people because they are healthy so we need to force them to pay into the system to support everyone else. But, this is not a fully considered perspective. First, the young people who would avoid health insurance are doing so because they make very little money. So, it is likely that they will fall into the subsidized programs that all the Democratic plans include. The young people who can afford health care probably have good jobs, so they probably already have health care. And, as a result of the competition you mentioned their costs could decrease as private providers game the system to dump low profit people into the government program.

Yes, all the Democratic plans do have minimum standards, portability requirements, pre-existing requirements, and other attempts to control the private companies. But, this too could have the effect of benefiting the private companies. All these requirements will be mandatory, so the companies don't need to compete on these fronts, they can incorporate the costs into their fees, then they can focus on creatively adjusting their plans so they appeal to the profitable health care users. Everyone else can look to the government plan or no plan if they aren't poor enough for a subsidy (not to mention the mandate fee they could be charged). And, it is important to note that the MA plan doesn't have strong minimum standards. This means that the national plan would not include cheap (but weak/useless) plans, therefore it would leave out even more people who would need to pay a mandate fee. (Of course, I'm not suggesting that the minimums should be dumped, because that would just allow people to be insured, where the insurance is useless. I'm just identifying another short coming of this approach. My point is that there are no practical differences between Obama, Edwards, and Clinton. None of them go for a single payer. And, it is perfectly legitimate to argue that mandates are a bad idea. And, it is unfair to the deny possibility that the Edwards/Clinton mandate mantra is anything more than political maneuvering and demagoguery—especially with the MA and CA examples).

Also, none of these plans is more or less likely to evolve into a single payer plan. In reality, a move to single payer would be a leap, not an evolution. You can see a point where SCHIP, medicare, and some version of the opened up government plan (which is supported by all the Democrats) end up as the biggest part of the health care system. Then, the pressure would be on to take out the private programs, because they would be left with the high profit health care users, while the government has relieved them of the unprofitable citizens. Mandates don't get to the end any faster; they just make life tougher for struggling, but not poor, families.

That's the truth as I see it. And, that's why mandates are a political ploy. The business interests against the Democratic plans don't really care about mandates. They will fire everything thing they have at Obama's plan. They're thinking a lot further down the road, we need to do the same.

Regarding the Obama phenomenon, he may or may not win against Clinton. But he is for real. In a 1995 profile in The Chicago Reader, he said, "What if a politician were to see his job as an organizer, as part teacher and part advocate, one who does not sell voters short but who educates them about the real choices before them?"

Sure Obama has and will make mistakes, but he has been on the same road with the same strategy for at least thirteen years, as the quote above demonstrates. Even you will acknowledge that John Edwards has "evolved" over a relatively short period of time. And, I was very troubled when Clinton declared that she found her voice in NH—this was touching on a human level, but you need to have found your voice long before you decide to run for the presidency.

Regarding the motivators for the MSM I'd also include laziness, busyness, exhaustion, group think, the entertainment factor and so on. Plus, if you think it's bad for Edwards, imagine being Huckabee. His coverage has been hilarious when you consider how well he's done.

-Jonathon
Honest Dialogue « Simple Gestures "Love Your Neighbor" Says:
February 10, 2008 at 6:14 pm
[…] 10, 2008 · No Comments Check this out…nice to see the conversation change from confrontation to common ground on […]
Obama: Not a man but a way of thinking « T.A.N.K. Says:
February 10, 2008 at 9:39 pm
[…] out this clip of an Obama supporter defending himself with reason and grace, and watch to the end to see the result. Truly […]
SENROC2 Says:
February 11, 2008 at 9:10 am
EVERY AFRICAN AMERICAN MALE CAN NOT PLAY SPORTS, DOSE NOT RAP OR DANCE OR WILL NOT SELL CRACK. MANY AFRICAN AMERICAN MALES ARE ARTICULANT, EDUCATED, SAINE, SENSITIVE, SOBER AN AWEAR OF THEIR "POLITICAL ENVIORMENT, ISSUES AND THEIR CHOICES."
Rhonda Says:
February 11, 2008 at 1:09 pm
My God. I learned more about each candidate's platform just by reading all the dialogue. Thanks Julian, Derrick, Joanthon, Ian. but for some reason I think to actually effect any change in how our country is governed because of the status quo. That doesn't mean that no candidate should not try but there are limitations as to what they can do because of how how the system was initially set up.

Any candidate that gets the job will need more than four years to undo all that has been done and all voters should understand all of the candidates abilities
Barbara Says:
February 13, 2008 at 8:15 am
Makes me so proud!!! and he informed in a way all can understand why we should vote Obama and how he (with us) will get us all out of the "muck and mire" we are in.
nastipoet Says:
February 13, 2008 at 9:46 am
I'm in awe, it is so refreshing to see a young black man express himself so well. I'm impressed with his knowledge and political views. I learned more from this interview than I"ve learned from watching the debates and news since this race began. I now have a more informed intention for placing my vote with Obama I'm convinced.
David Miller Says:
February 13, 2008 at 10:15 pm
Derrick is THE MAN!
Reggie Says:
February 13, 2008 at 10:41 pm
Bravo…..Bravo. I am so glad to see one of us on television who really knows what they are talking about. The reporter tried to stump him and he came with it and laid it down. Man I got two Master's degrees and I could not have made it through the first two questions without getting mad about him cutting me off. I am so proud of this guy, this is so for real…… other than the gum chewing he laid it down. I guess the no child left behind thing may work after all. lol!!!! They say that african americans are clueless…. yeah right!!!!!
WAY TO GO……. THANK YOU.

Reggie Smith
Gary In
Sandy Bee Says:
February 13, 2008 at 11:28 pm
Derrick you are an example of a strong, intelligent, educated Black man who lets his brain calculate what comes out of his mouth. Very precise and well spoken. You are the type of Man I would what my sons to talk too. You're parents should be proud. I certainly was.
Dawn-Renee Says:
February 13, 2008 at 11:45 pm
I am so thrilled to see young people take an interest in politics…things are happening in America; the other day (after Super Tuesday) my kids and I were so excited to hear two other young guys (in urban gear nonetheless) talking about how "happy they were to see a candidate that would truly be for the people…someone that is addressing unemployment, and examining ways to secure health care for every citizen". I couldn't believe it! I am in Alabama, and Obama slayed Hillary here…in the south! It's a wonderful thing to be a part of history in the making!
Texasboo Says:
February 14, 2008 at 2:03 pm
DERRICK YOU ROCK!! YOU ARE GOING TO MAKE A FINE LEADER SOMEDAY!! STAY ON TRACK!! I am so proud of you for representing!! You are well informed Obama supporter and thank you for speaking the truth about Obama's platform!! WAY TO REPRESENT!!
Cheryl Williams Says:
February 14, 2008 at 2:51 pm
Derrick is a fine representative of our young people today. It was extremely encouraging to hear him articulate the issues and suggestions for solutions to some our nations biggest problems. Go Derrick!
Gtrrdr3 Says:
February 14, 2008 at 2:53 pm
Derrick, AWSOME! I'm tired of people feeling like African Americans are ONLY voting for Obama because of his race! I have voted since I was 18 and I don't EVER recall hearing white americans asked if they are voting for a candidate because he is WHITE!!
Julian,
Why don't you quit wasting time on this Blog and get up, get out, and do something!
esandman01 Says:
February 14, 2008 at 3:43 pm
This is such an amazing video.
Daphne Says:
February 14, 2008 at 3:45 pm
Very impressive. He did his homework like so many of us Obama supporters have.
Anonymous Says:
February 14, 2008 at 6:19 pm
Derrick: Join the team, we need you on the campaign trail.

Louis
Cynthia Robinson Says:
February 14, 2008 at 7:53 pm
Derrick:

I have listened to both of your videos and I just want to THANK YOU for being a prime example for our young generation, you make me Proud in every sense of the word, YOU, the Derricks of the world, are what we are Hoping for in our children, thank you for allowing me to continue to be Hopeful for all of us and Proud to be a seasoned Black American. I know your parents are Proud because WE are proud of you. God Bless You and YES WE CAN!

Cynthia
Atlanta, Ga
Maxine Says:
February 14, 2008 at 8:12 pm
Hear Ye, Hear Ye! Let me add that the utube of Hillary and Edwards conspiring, go back and check it out…well, they are still conspiring. And, thanks whoever posted it.

Does everyone know that Hillary has met with John since he left the race, and that Obama has refused a meeting with John?

I wonder what John wants in return for his delegates?

Anyway, Julian, not like the "good old days", huh? By the way, how many countries do you consider yourself a citizen? heh, heh…Honey, you're going to find it more difficult, as time goes by, to continue to run this here America, my friend!
TheRealObamaGirl Says:
February 14, 2008 at 8:47 pm
Julian, please go away. Put down that cup of Hater-Aid. It can be toxic to your health. Shane, you nailed it! Thanks!
mdgirlforobama Says:
February 15, 2008 at 12:10 am
kudos to Derrick. even though i know Obama's stand on issues and his public works out of the "lime light", i am not sure i could have been as articulate with a camera all of a sudden stuck in my face.

i think the reporter singled him out figuring he would stumble when talking real issues.

glad to see reporter put on the ropes instead.

Julian, sorry your guy dropped out , but it's time to move on. we welcome you to the Obama side.

YES WE CAN
B J ofAtlanta Says:
February 15, 2008 at 12:17 am
Derrick, I thought you did an excellent job with this interviewer. I think he chose you because he had pre-conceived thoughts when he first looked @ you. That's the way you SHOCK them. He learned a valuable lesson (even though he'll never admit!) You cannot judge a book by its color!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

GO DERRICK!
Chuck Says:
February 15, 2008 at 7:58 am
Intelligence at its best, catching the reporter off guard, I love this guy!!! It show that WE know what WE are talking about when WE support the BEST candidate for the job.

YES WE CAN….

YES WE CAN Derrick

YES WE CAN Obama

Chuck
Philadelphia, PA

Derrick for VP, I second the nomination !!!
norman Says:
February 15, 2008 at 12:10 pm
brillant young man, way to represent. derrick, hug your parents, they have done a remarkable job. young people of today all should pay attention to your voice. i have a feeling that it will be a force in the future, future of america.
wavester Says:
February 15, 2008 at 1:07 pm
sagereader, you hit the nail on the head!!!!
Tanyetta Says:
February 15, 2008 at 1:11 pm
Wow! This is quite impressive. Bravo. I'm sure the reporter will definitely remember you!

p.s. Derrick, take the GUM OUT OF YOUR mouth the next time you get on camera.
ddowensatl Says:
February 15, 2008 at 2:17 pm
Derrick,

Your response to your response is equally as passionate. I really appreciate your being in the right place at the right time to deliver the message for those who are usually ignored or considered voiceless.

Peace
William James Says:
February 15, 2008 at 2:58 pm
Derrick is the mannnnnn, right on kid, OBAMA all the way!
Kim Says:
February 15, 2008 at 3:37 pm
Absolutely outstanding interview Derrick! You were queried more doggedly than a candidate. You responded with grace under fire and savvy. Magnifique!
Leanna Owens Says:
February 15, 2008 at 4:40 pm
Where did this kid go to school?!! Hats off to his parents for this highly educated and well-versed young man.
b. Says:
February 15, 2008 at 5:37 pm
This reporter's tactics represent exactly the sentiment that a lot of people, even the mainstream media, try to portray – that Obama's popularity among African Americans is based on some racially motivated, emotional, almost blind following. His tone was completely loaded and accusatory in nature. Fortunately this young man was able to handle himself with intelligence and poise. We need to see & hear from more young black men like Derrick whore are are aware of the world around them and invested in speaking out!
Kofi Kankam Says:
February 15, 2008 at 5:37 pm
Leanna,

Derrick Ashong - Harvard '97. He was a classmate and still a friend. Derrick, if you're reading this note, I'm blowing up your spot!

Way to represent, bro. I'm very proud.

Kof
SHEILAGG Says:
February 15, 2008 at 5:59 pm
WELL DONE

I MUST ADMIT BECAUSE OF SEN OBAMA & SEN CLINTON I AM MUCH MORE TUNED IN TO THIS RACE. DERRICK YOU FOR SURE MADE ME WANT TO READ OBAMA 101 FROM BEGINNING TO END. I HAVE BEEN LISTENING EVERYDAY TO ANY STATION WITH ANYTHING ON ABOUT THIS RACE. I AM trying to be learned about everything i can.

I believe in Sen Obama and he has my vote I will continue to listen until the fat lady has sung.

I have been telling my daughter for days now, that you have to better than "Hilary is the bomb"

Why is she the bomb ? you have to come better than that.
Larry - Santa Barbara Says:
February 15, 2008 at 7:36 pm
An informed voter is a beautiful thing.
CJ Says:
February 15, 2008 at 7:49 pm
I am imppressed as Derrick is very inteligent and I am sure that there are more young people just as inteligent as him who is going to get Obama's vote. This race is very interesting and as far as I am concerned, history has been made.
Obama is giving Hillary a run for her money and I do believe that Obama will be our first Black President!!
gdtwriter Says:
February 15, 2008 at 8:33 pm
Thank you for breaking it down Derrick!
Dr. Obvious Says:
February 15, 2008 at 9:05 pm
This interviewer and interviewee were an obviously BOTH Obama plants.

Why would a Obama-opposer let a copy of the interviewer looking bad leak out?

If you do not see this, you are really dense.
Vince from Philly, Pa Says:
February 15, 2008 at 10:34 pm
Derrick was on point with his responses to the questions and fashioned a great football cap! "Go IGGLES!" LOL!
notimpressed Says:
February 15, 2008 at 11:12 pm
Would I be all over joyed if this man where white? Goddamn it, we have another Biden on our hands. People are impressed that a grown behind man, carrying a picket sign in support of someone, does not have a modicrum of facts behind him to support his stance. Now I'm supposed to get all happy and tap dance because an educated man spoke educated?

People are out of their minds, I swear. Though I glad he didn't falsely represent us like some of the people reports often extend the mic to, he was not what I'll call informed. He didn't utilize specifics and categorically break down what it was that differentiated Obama from the rest of the pack. He didn't talk about actual costs to you and I, the 'uninsured'. He utilized the basic information that anyone who picks up a newspaper and just peruses the topic would have at their disposal.

People have to learn to expect more. I mean, good job Derrick. But now you, tongue in cheeck, should be a spokes person because you were just so above and beyond? Get the heck out of here.
Danny Says:
February 15, 2008 at 11:27 pm
Mike the interviewer was incredibly rude.
John G. Osborn - Springfield, MA Says:
February 16, 2008 at 8:18 am
Reading all of the comments concerning Derricks interview I'm reminded of the Colin Powell characterization: "He's so articulate, he's so well spoken". Derrick is certainly both of those things. Yet. the truth is, not everyone is blessed with the gift of oratory skills, the ability to summon their facts, or have the poise that Derrick demonstrated during that interview. Although, like most Obama supporters, I consider myself reasonably informed about the issues and the candidates positions, I'm not sure I would have been able to respond as well as Derrick did -especially under that kind of pressure. So I for one, am certainly glad he was there when we - the less articulate, needed him to represent for us. Great job Derrick!

Equally as important, though, in his "Response to the Video" video, Derrick further articulates his emotional attachment to Obama's campaign, and by his own admission, it's all about hope. A Hope that our country can live up to its founding principals and a hope for what is possible if we have the courage to pursue real, fundamental change. (If you haven't seen that video, be assured, it's equally as inspiring.)

At a time when America is one of the mosted despised nations on the planet and it's people are "leading lives of quiet desperation", hope is exactly what's called for at this time, and in this place. I believe it was Emily Dickinson that said: "Hope is a feathered entity that nests in the soul". Let's do what we know is best - and what is right, for ALL Americans.

Dare to hope. Dare to act. Si se puede!
simplegestures Says:
February 16, 2008 at 10:46 am
I agree with the previous comment. It's not about how well we articulate the argument, as I would argue it's not about how articulate Obama is in his presentations of hope. Instead it is in the very act of hope as expressed in it's multi-variate forms is what is propelling this movement. Populism is not about the candidate, it is about the people believing in themselves and they hope we all possess.
Rosalind Says:
February 16, 2008 at 10:49 am
In reading the responses to Derrick's interview, which was AWESOME by the way, I found it interesting that the people who didn't agree with Derrick, found it necessary to write the longest responses to prove their point. People may have different views, but at the end of the day, Derrick was articulate, informed, and didn't allow the reporter to railroad him.

AWESOME job Derrick!
Shaun Says:
February 16, 2008 at 11:26 am
I realy wish that folks would stop throwing race out there. Derrick is a well spoken, intelligent young man. He's informed on the the issues and we should all be proud of him as a young black man, but as I see from the comments this video has generated, everyone is deemng the interviewer racist, or subtle racist. I really dont see that being the case. I just saw a sprited enlightening debate that ended on a positive note. I'm black myself and for one, just tired of folks throwing racism charges around when obviously no racism occured. Big ups to Derrick though, I'm sure you make your father very proud.
Rogers Says:
February 16, 2008 at 1:05 pm
The subject matter was to address the manner in which America views the African-American after all these years slavery has ended: Ignorant and Inarticulate! Derrick spoke well as do a great number of African-Americans. I commend Derrick on his ability to articulate his views and help dispell Americas' ideas of the stero-typical African-American race as projected by the media, but by no means should any reader believe his "interview" will change most of America. For those of you who are unaware, Derrick is not alone, there are volumes more just like him or better!

Rogers/Tx
Love this vid » The Obama Campaigner Says:
February 16, 2008 at 1:19 pm
[…] http://thinkonthesethings.wordpress.com/2008/02/06/video-interviewer-picks-the-wrong-obama-supporter… […]
Eric Says:
February 16, 2008 at 3:22 pm
This so-called "interviewer" (read "right-wing crank") picked that young man because he saw a black kid that he figured would give him a stupid answer. When he got intelligent answered he decided to stop letting the kid talk. He stopped asking questions and started bombarding him with talking points. It ceased to be an interview at all because the whole purpose of the stunt was to portray Obama's supporters as stupid people who don't have the sense enough to know what they're voting for, the "short on specifics" canard. The interviewer wound up looking like the idiot in this one.
Neal Gillie Says:
February 16, 2008 at 3:34 pm
That's an informed young brother. I consider myself to be a knowledgable, senior citizen. However, I doubt I could have answered those questions as well as Derrick. My hat's off to him and to his parents.
Cynthia Says:
February 16, 2008 at 5:40 pm
Derrick is wonderful. he was time enough for the interviewer. In addition, the interview was a tad rude.
Lawrence Says:
February 16, 2008 at 6:43 pm
Derrick, you are one tight brother. Have you ever thought about a future in politics?
carol Says:
February 16, 2008 at 7:06 pm
You are to be commended, Derrick. You articulated your viewpoint very well. This reporter will go home and do his homework, before he decides to confront another young and intelligent Black brother. Kudos to you.

Carol
HBCUkidz Says:
February 16, 2008 at 9:24 pm
Derrick,
U took control of this interview! Way to go!

Love this clip!

Joan
Howard Visiting Says:
February 17, 2008 at 1:31 am
Face it, guys, only a small percentage of people viewing this interiview have done anything like the intellectual work that Derek has done to study the issue and the candidates' various plans. And an even smaller percentage of those who will vote are capable of understanding this info no matter how clearly it is explained. I'm sick over our educational and healthcare systems as currently constituted, but I know this much: neither Hillary's plan nor Obama's goes as far as it must to solve the problem. And I fear that we will never have the political will to support the only plan fair plan, i.e., single-payer. That was the sound of a hundred million voters booing "socialism."

Worse, getting there from here may simply be beyond our financial abilities. I live in New Jersey. Why can't we build another bridge to Manhattan? Why can't any major city build a big bridge anymore? It is not even thinkable. Let's start with the fact that our taxes are lower than elsewhere in the Western world, and, of course, they are too high as it is. Cancel out the money lining pockets and leaking away because of inefficiencies and waste and we are left with all the other places besides bridges that these moneys MUST go. Like healthcare. Like education. This country is not what it once was.

The only rational defense of an employer-based system is that an expensive superstructure is in place and we have no real choice but to use it. Healthcare, like other employee benefits, has historically been employer-centered as a way of attracting better employees., but the burden is too great on employers. We've tried to bringing down costs: it's called "managed care" and began when Hillary was stopped cold in her tracks back in the early 90s. Somehow universal care (37 uninsured then) got twisted into managed care, built around the idea that this was the only solution to rising costs. Guess what? Costs are still rising and there are 47 million uninsured.

The insurers and newly formed HMOs saw the balance of power shift in their direction, while the providers — hospitals and doctors — lost power. Neither of the Dem's plans speak for the buyer, unless you count a mandate as somehow empowering. To be honest, I agree entirely with Derek: for many issues, the only way to get there from here is pulbic/private partnershisps — theoretically. Did someone say "socialism"?

It's nice to see the kids on the march, and a real kick to see Derek embarass not only his interviewer, but you and me (though not Julian and Shane). I used to be on the march. But if the candidates can do no better than this, there is no reason to expect things to get much better any decade soon. Our parents saw better days. Our kids are going to be outcompeted. When we can't afford to spend and can't afford not to, what else would you expect to happen?
Derrick Fan for Life Says:
February 17, 2008 at 9:37 am
Way to represent Derrick! Try as he may have, to trip you up, you totally represented. YOU ARE THE MAN! And by the way, you are absolutely correct on the issues. I could not have said it better. In fact, I've been waiting for the opportunity, or for the CORRECT person to be choosen in these events…. Wait no longer. You took care of more than you know…. Peace. and keep that education going. It is obvious.
Ellin Rind Says:
February 17, 2008 at 12:41 pm
Derrick, it is a joy to hear a young man speak as well and coherently as you do I, too, am supporting Obama for the final reason you stated Let's hope we are are right. Please, Derrick, don't vote for McCain.
Deb from Chi Town Says:
February 17, 2008 at 2:05 pm
Wow, what an interesting read for the last hour!!! Thanks to Derrick, and all of you who have responded. I am actually going to register to vote this year due to the fact that our home town guy is finally making strides in getting everyone to see that we need to work together–blacks/whites, Dems/GOPs, men/women to affect change in our great nation. Great info, great feedback, and let's make it be a great election! YES WE CAN!!!
kiara ashanti Says:
February 17, 2008 at 2:47 pm
Derrick makes some good points. But heres the problem. Obama and Clinton's plan will still end up being socialized medicine. They put the emaphasis more on the government via subsidies. Here's what will happen. The government plan will be less money of course. Let's say for arguments sake, 75 a month. A private plan will be 160 or more a month. Which one will you pick? The vast majority will go with the government plan, and so we end up being like Canada by default. The problem with Derrick is even though he has reasoned out a thought view on the health care issue, his candidate still has a piss poor solution. Why? Because the root cause of health costs is the cost of the insurance. In other words, the problem is not that the government is not paying for our health care, its that the policies are too expensive for some to afford. SO WHAT NOT JUST FIND WAYS TO MAKE IT LESS EXPENSIVE. And thats where the problem with Democrats comes in. The way they want to solve every problem is with the government. Why can't they ever let the people, or business solve a problem for once. Nearly every single major problem we've had and corrected has been fixed by private industry anyway.

Bottom line is that Obama's appeal is emotional, not logical. If it was logical, then he would not say I'm going to make the economy better, even though I'm going to raise taxes, and start a new trillion dollar entitlement program.
THAMSPX1 Says:
February 17, 2008 at 4:17 pm
This kid is a future Obama. He's sensational and superior to many in Congress.
Jonathon Says:
February 17, 2008 at 4:32 pm
Kiara,

Unrestrained regulations and trickle down economics isn't very popular after a time of diminishing corporate oversight, rising corporate profits and stagnant wages for the middle class while the super-rich have seen great increases in wealth.

I would argue that it's not logical to stick with the status quo Bush economic theories.

It can also be argued that a government take over of health care would be good for citizens and for businesses. Single payer systems work in the rest of the world, and they have lower costs. Studies have shown that our system spends more money without providing better health care (http://www.dartmouthatlas.org/). Sticking to ideological beliefs rather than choosing to solve problems isn't very logical or productive.
Dee Says:
February 17, 2008 at 4:56 pm
I am very proud and pleased as a mother of an black man that Derrick represented us in a positive way!!! Wonderful interview Derrick!! He was poised and articulated his point of view with clarity in his own way!! Thank God we live in America, because if we lived in North Korea, some of us would have been tortured already!!!
maureen Says:
February 17, 2008 at 6:57 pm
Dear Lord! Thank you, thank you thank you…Young, bright, intelligent, informed and wouldn't back down… Coming from a black city in total crisis (Detroit) IT IS A PLEASURE… TO SEE UNBOUGHT FOLKS.. LETTING THERE THOUGHTS BE KNOWN IN SUCH AN INFORMED WAY!
Mary Yamada Says:
February 17, 2008 at 7:38 pm
Is there some way I can read what this fellow is saying? I am hearing impaired and need close captioning. Thanks.
Mary
sagereader Says:
February 17, 2008 at 7:57 pm
Kiara, the opposite of "logical" is "illogical." Emotional and logical are not antonyms. You can be both emotional and logical AND you can be both emotional and illogical.

Therefore, your last paragraph doesn't follow.
askou Says:
February 17, 2008 at 8:49 pm
Derrick was time enough for the interviewer. There are intelligent black men.
Jerry McClough Says:
February 17, 2008 at 10:59 pm
Tell this brother to call me (edited)!!!!!
Nani G Says:
February 18, 2008 at 9:24 am
Derrick is a well informed individual , But because he is black we are making it a big deal that he can make a well educated response? … there are plenty of educated black people out there. he is not one of the few , he is one of the many.
Freida from Alabama Says:
February 18, 2008 at 9:42 am
I Looked at the video through the "wrong eyes." I have seen interviews on the street where the reporter asks a question or two and move on. This was truly an interview/interrogation. As a teacher, I stress you can not judge a book by its cover. The reporter thought that Derrick was another Joe Blow on the street campaigning. I think the reporter tone went from offensive to pure shock that this man on the street could be so articulate but looked so unrefine. After watching this video we should all prepare ourselves for the unthinkable whenever we are out in public.
cvspanos Says:
February 18, 2008 at 10:32 am
Barak: Put Derrick on your staff! Great spokesman!
ASultryWmn Says:
February 18, 2008 at 11:29 am
Good interview. Derrick, I'm stunned the interviewer let you speak so long. Usually when an interviewer runs into someone as articulate as you, they cut the interview real short. But, instead this guy kept trying to rattle you, hoping for the, " I don't know answer." LOL glad you had a bag full of answers.
Jac Says:
February 18, 2008 at 11:34 am
Kudos to Derrick. I loved the way Derrick used his intellect and I laughed with much pride as the inteeviewer did his "transparent reversal" once he saw that Derrick was educated, mature, well-off, AND ON TOP OF HIS GAME!!!
Amelia Gamble Says:
February 18, 2008 at 12:05 pm
Way to go young man! Questions were thrown at you before you could finish your sentences, but you fired back like a champ. What you did in a few minutes prompted some to sit down and "write a book" to try and discredit your unrehearsed and unavoidably brief and instant answers. You are brilliant and well-spoken, a shock to those who would pre-judge you.
Allison Says:
February 18, 2008 at 12:20 pm
Bravo Derrick! I immediately got the feeling that the interviewer basically "profiled" you as the mythical, ignorant Black Man (young black guy, wearing a baseball cap - - - what could he possibly know about politics, right?)

You handed him his hat and did so in an elegant and poised way. You, my young man, like Obama, represent the pride and hopethat emcompasses our people and, indeed, the people of this nation. Great things shall come forth from you! Can't WAIT to see what your future holds!
Lacy Says:
February 18, 2008 at 2:42 pm
Derrick,
As a mother, I am proud of you son
As a woman, I am proud of you young man
As a lover of words, I love you
As a human being, I am glad to be of your species
As a black woman, I wish I had a daughter your age
As a confused voter, clarified on some issues
As a poet, I will write of you

I just like many when I first saw you waited with breath held for your response…after hearing you…. I exhaled!
PaladinX Says:
February 18, 2008 at 3:24 pm
Thank you Derrick. Once again this proves that it is a fact that "knowledge is king"…
Phil Says:
February 18, 2008 at 4:15 pm
Julian,

JE was the most populist/progressive candidate of the top 3…on that we can agree, but he is no longer running. He's been scratched. Time to pick a horse who is still in the race, and bet on him/her. JE will do that as soon as he determines which one best represent his initiatives.

OBAMA 08
Phil Says:
February 18, 2008 at 4:17 pm
PS… ROCK ON DERRICK!!!
Penny Says:
February 18, 2008 at 4:25 pm
I, too, was impressed with Derrick and am sure the reporter didn't expect an intelligent response. What most of you missed was that Derrick did not receive his early education here in the U.S.! That could be the reason he's so articulate.
Anonymous Says:
February 18, 2008 at 4:46 pm
Derrick you totally Rock!!!
Anonymous Says:
February 18, 2008 at 6:29 pm
Derrick. I know your parents are proud of you, and my hat is off to them for raising an articulate, thoughtful, intellectual young man. It's great to see one of our own shown in a positive light. You represented in a big way. The interviewer kept trying to trip you up but he was the one that fell flat on his face! You kept stating the facts that apply to the reasons why Obama is the candidate to choose. I feel a little more confident about our nation because of young people like you that are motivated to become involved in this political process. Julian, thank you for your response to Shane's gibberish!!!!!
darius Says:
February 18, 2008 at 6:52 pm
one black idiot trying to help another black idiot out ,, how impressive is this ,, this is why our country is not going ,, but gone to hell see ya in hell if you believe all that crap NOT VOTING FOR NONE OF THE DAMN IDIOTS
Lena Says:
February 18, 2008 at 7:14 pm
Derrick is unbelievable. He is definitely a model that young people need to follow. I am so proud to hear this young man explain so matter of factly, why he he supporting Obama. Obama needs him in his inner circle.
CDM Says:
February 18, 2008 at 7:21 pm
The comments in this blog have been eye-opening. Julian, Shane, and Ian should contact the candidates of their choice and give them the same arugments and information they have supplied on this blog. My comments to Julian re: JEdwards - though I really like him, he could not win his home state despite the fact that the voters there know him better than any other voters in the country. His problem wasn't his platform, his message or his appeal, it was his connection to a losing ticket in 2004 and the view that he continues to represent a failed attempt at the presidency. We are not looking for has-beens or former losers but someone who does not respresent the mainstream - that goes for Hillary Clinton also. JEdwards would not have carried the critical Democratic base in the general election because most were not energized by his message. It takes numbers to win the election, more voters in every state to carry the electoral college vote. Jedwards would not have drawn the numbers. It is doubtful that he would even carry Southern states. Additionally, where was his draw among Independents a critical voter block?

I can't argue the pros and cons of healthcare system because I'm not verse in those issues, but one thing is clear the private sector is not saving anybody any money and the free market has done nothing to curb health-care costs. The belief that the free market passes savings on to the public is not borne out by the rising costs of everything from housing to food costs to gasoline prices and is further eroded by the greed of shareholders and corporate executives and senior managers who seem to profit more from the free market than anyone. Let's face it the average consumer is screwed. They either pay the prices demanded or they go without. A healthcare system that does not reign in prices/costs is dead for the consumer from its inception. Mandated healthcare ignores the basic requirement that you must have money to make the purchase. Who will subsidies go to? I gurantee that the middle class will be shut out of subsidies because they make too much money. A catastrophic medical event doesn't just impact the poor without health insurance it impacts all economic levels and only the very rich can afford it without affordable insurance. Let's get our heads out of the sand. It should not cost $400 for a pill in the hospital or $600 per night for a hospital bed. The health insurance CEOs are making a killing - Aetna $30.8M, Cigna $29M, Aflac $28M and the CEO of United Health has a hefty $1.6B stock options portfolio. So where do you think the incentive to raise prices or at least keep them high is and who votes for that? Without government intervention we, the consumers are out of luck. Our solo voices are crying into the wilderness while lobbyists for the healthcare industry shuffle your elected officials around in private jets and throw them lavish parties. I don't care who the candidate is they all benefit from these special interests.

I want a fresh voice who can really get things done. I really don't know who that is. It has yet to be shown that Obama can galvinize enough Republicans and Democrats to get anything accomplished in Washington. Clinton owes alot of people favors, she can't possibly be free to make decisions free of the favortism. McCain has painted himself into a right-wing conservative corner in order to win the nomination. Huckabee - please. The only way for either party to succeed on that front is to get a super majority in the House and Senate and kill fillibusters in the Senate. Beyond that it will take 20 years not 4 to undue the harm caused by the present administration's policies to enrich the rich at the expense of everyone else.

By the way, Derrick did a better job then most at articulating his opinion of the candidates. The interviewer resorted to interruptions and constantly barraging Derrick with more questions before he could even answer the original question. He clearly had an agenda though it was not entirely clear what it was. I applaud Derrick for standing on emotion and on intellect to answer the questions. Without emotion the U.S.A. would likely not be in existence, slavery would not have ended, the Civil War would not have been fought, none of the World Wars would have been waged or contested and hope would be just another 4-letter word.

CDM

I won't get caught up in the policy declarations of any of the candidates. I'm more of a Jerry Macquire kind of person - "show me the money". Talk is cheap. I want to know how you are going to pay for your lofty ideas and on whom the burden will fall to ante-up the cash. I'm a middle class African American who has not seen hide nor hair of a tax cut, tax break whether on the local or federal level.
Ms Freddie Says:
February 18, 2008 at 7:50 pm
Go Derrick,

You are one brother I know that have made your Mom and Dad proud. You have made me Proud. If all of us would take the time to read, we all could be at this same point.
Troy Says:
February 18, 2008 at 8:24 pm
Good Job, Derrick!!!

I feel as though I have a thorough understanding of Barack's policies, however I NEVER would have been able to withstand the constant interruptions and surely would have been baited into a less PC discussion!

That being said, my friends and I often talk about the fervor with which nearly EVERYONE you meet talks about their candidate. I will certainly own up to participating in some spirited debates(always friendly) over the last few months.

My current thoughts center on the issue of identity. I have very valid reasons for supporting Sen. Obama and have studied his and ALL of the other candidates on every issue that is important to me. My stance is more closely aligned with Barack's, therefore he gets my vote.
My wife asked who I would vote for if two candidates were identical on issues important to me and one of those was Obama.
As a black man, I unabashedly would chose the Senator from Illinois…..& yes it would be because he looks like me. The point here is that it is perfectly ok to vote emotionally…..if all other things are equal and I would never be ashamed to INCLUDE in my reasons for support that one is because I identify.

To further clarify, I didn't vote for Jesse in '88 or Sharpton in '04 because our views didn't align, so there is precedent here.
But, I just want to say that its ok to say I like the fact that there may be a black man in the White House & I hope that Derrick isnt afraid to say the same.
Michelle Says:
February 18, 2008 at 8:54 pm
As a journalist I am ashamed this interviewer was so harassing and constantly interrupting. It seemed like he was just trying to get Derrick to be stumped by a question so he could have a clip of someone saying Obama is just about the feeling, not answer on the issues.
Michelle Says:
February 18, 2008 at 9:14 pm
Wow Julian, you made some excellent points. I thank you and those who responded for the impressive dialogue. (Julian if you blog anywhere else, please post)
Fiyah Says:
February 18, 2008 at 9:15 pm
Derrick handled himself with class and care. I agree with the previous commentor who pointed out the not so subtle racism of the interviewer who seemed to think that by barraging Derrick with question after question he would stumble; in fact he got quite the opposite. I believe this is a supreme case for education not just academically but socially and the like. Because when those that believe that the color of your skin equates inferiority in thinking, and reasoning or that your existence is reduced to buffoonery when it comes to your representation in the media, you can handle yourself with class, care, tact and an educated opine. Derrick YOU MAKE ME PROUD!!
SaSaMenAb Quammie Says:
February 18, 2008 at 9:50 pm
Derrick, I just stopped my children Ptah (16) and Kemeta (14) from doing their chores to show them what a well informed and articulate person sounds and looks like (THEM)! You are the role model for the future. I always tell my children please know what is going on in the world, in your community and in your heart. You need to go across the country teaching our children even some adults how to respond in front of the camera. Public speaking or your own show is in your future. Don't sleep!!!! lol OBAMA you better pick this young man up - your campaign needs someone like this. Let us know how to get in contact with you. I would love to bring you to Boca Raton for a meet and greet. sasaquammie@hotmail.com
Can we get this on the air @ BET? « O Hell Nawl! Says:
February 19, 2008 at 3:33 am
[…] [Think On These Things] […]
Renewed Man Says:
February 19, 2008 at 5:47 am
I am in a foreign land, I don't get to see all what is going on at this critical time for America. I can admit that I now have more understandiing of what is going on after reading the whole string of posts here. It is educational and inspiring that I should "dig" for more understanding of issues being put forward by candidates.

However I still say that:
OBAMA is the reason for the season
OBAMA is the man for the season, the rest are flashy followers.

Derrick thanks for adding to my knowledge.
The Economist Discusses Derrick Ashong's Youtube Video about Barack Obama « Think On These Things Says:
February 19, 2008 at 8:05 am
[…] Video: Interviewer Picks Wrong Obama Supporter to Try to Railroad […]
Carolyn Adams Says:
February 19, 2008 at 8:13 am
This young man is impressive! Good to hear young people taking a stand.
Gee Says:
February 19, 2008 at 8:38 am
I am without question impressed with Derrick.
So, so proud the way he handled the interview.
I'd vote for Derrick for Vice President.

Hey Derrick, obviously we'd like to hear more from you.
adams Says:
February 19, 2008 at 8:45 am
Great Job Derrick.
Go Derrick, Go Derrick, Go Derrick!!!!
Abundent Says:
February 19, 2008 at 10:27 am
Well, well…..i do believe that the game we watched ended in a check-mate for Derrick. His poise and command of the issues concerning Senator Obama was the exact opposite of his interviewer's expectations. Not only that…..Derrick is young, articulate and unafraid to be who he is. Senator Obama would do well to have Derrick's interview broadcasted at the Democratic Convention as an example of the type of individuals that support him.
Bravo Derrick!
Anonymous Says:
February 19, 2008 at 10:32 am
I AM SO GLAD YOU ASKED THAT..Go D.

I LOVE because on some things I would be a dear in head lights.

You represented!

Now we all know he is NOT going to vote for Mccain…DONT SLEEP!

HA HA HA!

YES WE CAN!

I love it he was young, black and a male.
Sharron Says:
February 19, 2008 at 10:57 am
Once again, we must remember not to judge a book by it's cover. There are so many "Derrick's" waiting for a chance to be heard. I am so proud of and impressed with both Barrack and Derrick for their ability to enunciate so passionately our concerns while reminding us that we ALL make a difference and have something to contribute. BRAVO!!!
Andrea Morgan-Keeles Says:
February 19, 2008 at 12:19 pm
…now that is what I am talking about - young people who are interested in was is going on in this country…..and can talk with intelligence.
Anonymous Says:
February 19, 2008 at 12:33 pm
This was a great interview, we need more Derrick's in front of the camera. Very good information. I will be paying more attentation. I am more sure of Barrack and will be looking toward the changes I know he will bring. Very proud and impressed with Derrick, he was not tripped up on any thing the reporter ask him.
AFADI Says:
February 19, 2008 at 12:44 pm
As a fellow Ghanaian, Derrick: w'aye adiee paaa!!!

The brilliant thing about this snippet is the extent to which it both - unwittingly - debunks the notion of the apathetic Black voter, as well as re-inforcing Obama's call for change.

Change from unjust perceptions.
Change from viewing the world in a static fashion.
Change TOWARD a society that is more inclusive than before.

A lot of the positions spouted by politicians come of as didactic, vacuous, re-spins of the same old story. I would submit that more of us taking Derrick's approach to have more than just a passing, superficial comprehension of said issues, and articulating them before the candidates, would force them to spend more time addressing the specific mechanisms and approaches via which their "platforms" can be executed.

Ayekooo Ghanaba Derrick!
cecily.info - Video: Interviewer Picks The Wrong Obama Supporter to Try To Railroad Says:
February 19, 2008 at 12:54 pm
[…] [via Think on These Things] […]
broadsword Says:
February 19, 2008 at 1:03 pm
That reporter couldn't possibly have done a better job carrying water for the GOP. Derrick just plain *schooled* him. That….was awesome.
Babajohn Says:
February 19, 2008 at 1:22 pm
Long live America……

Derrick…..You do us proud……….
Miguel Charris Says:
February 19, 2008 at 2:18 pm
tHE TITLE IS WRONG IT WAS NOT A MISTAKE TO INTERVIEW THIS YOUNG MAN UNLESS YOU DON'T LIKE OBAMA, IF YOU DO HE HAS THE RIGHT ANSWER FOR ALL THE AGRESIVE QUESTIONS MADE TO HIM
nomadik Says:
February 19, 2008 at 3:07 pm
word Derrick! much love to you
Endbullying Today! » Blog Archive » Racism and ageism alive and well in political US! Says:
February 19, 2008 at 3:16 pm
[…] friend of my sent me the link to this interview with an Obama supporter-a young black man. Pay attention to the interviewer and you will see how […]
Syracuse in focus (SIF) » Blog Archive » What does an informed voter look like? Says:
February 19, 2008 at 3:18 pm
[…] I received this link from photographer Chester Higgins (NYT). All voters should be this educated. […]
kennieken Says:
February 19, 2008 at 3:44 pm
What language is the Fireman109 Speaking? Anyway, Derrieck is well versed on his candidate and I agree, it should not be about the party, but about the man or woman running for the candidacy. Barack speaks volumns. I am a Democrat, but I vote for Barack because he represents possibilities and change, not because he is a Democrat. I am glad Derrick was focused.
Ashley from KCMO Says:
February 19, 2008 at 4:22 pm
Derrick handled himself very well. I'm impressed with the intelligent and socially aware representation of a Barack supported. More importantly I'm impressed with Derrick's emotion control and desire to continue with the interview even after being talked to with expectations of ignorance. It was amazing how the interviewer began with very short and dismissive responses to the depth of Derrick's knowledge and eventually after realizing his level of awareness attempted to form an alliance. The interviewer not only began to speak in a receptive tone, he even wanted to credit himself with the brilliance by saying "I have been saying that for years…". Way to flip the script and actually challenge his ignorance Derrick. You have some very attractive qualities, job well done!
Syracuse in focus (SIF) » Blog Archive » What does an informed voter look like? Says:
February 19, 2008 at 5:30 pm
[…] received this link from photographer Chester Higgins (NYT). All voters should be this educated about their candidate and the […]
Sweet from Savannah Say: Says:
February 19, 2008 at 5:42 pm
Derick,

You re the man. I am very impressed by your responses and support them 100%. It not about parties, it's about who can bring the individuals together to make real change. Job well done.
kaykitty Says:
February 19, 2008 at 6:43 pm
Go on Derrick! Be Blessed!
Ben-CA Says:
February 19, 2008 at 6:56 pm
Derrick,

WELL DONE!!!

Hope many will start reading the plans and realize how intelligent OBAMA's plan is.
That is exactly why OBAMA does so well with educated people.

I wish this will be clearer to all americans!

Derrick,- you are a blessing! GOD's favor be upon you
James Says:
February 19, 2008 at 7:28 pm
WOW!!!
That is one very informed dude!
I am honestly in awe of this.
Will you please run for office?
william l. burt jr. Says:
February 19, 2008 at 7:37 pm
i beleive that OBAMA is inteligent and the best for the USA to be president if the KKK indorced OBAMA and they want OBAMA to win hes on the right path. i'm disabled and need to register to vote i live in Cleveland ohio 44123 my address is above can you help me to register?
sagereader Says:
February 19, 2008 at 7:50 pm
Mr. Burt,

You can call the Barack Obama Cleveland, Ohio Headquarters to get help. I'm sure they can send someone over to help you register. Here is their phone number and address:

815 Superior Avenue East, Suite 100
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
216.861.2000 office phone
Michael V. Says:
February 19, 2008 at 8:06 pm
I was very impressed with Derrick's subject knowledge and ability to express his opinion. Despite their political affiliations, such capable commenteary from young persons, leaves me somewhat reassured about the future of this nation. In particular, I found Derrick empowering because he stated what so many of us feel - it's not the person or the party. Rather, it's which side will move us from the madness of the last eight years, into solutions for the realities of the challenges we face today! As an aside, I am also amazed at the many responders who felt that the interviewer had a CLEARLY fixed opinion about Derrick, in the presence of nothing more than intense questioning about his position. Isn't that the sought of interviewing that we would expect to elicit more honest responses from any office holder/seeker? Frankly, I found it refreshing! Derrick's ability to handle it only underscores the need for its greater application!
Candace Beater Says:
February 19, 2008 at 10:26 pm
It is good to see young people so in tune with what is going on with politics today. This interview shows that African Americans who may support or do support Obama are about the issues and not because he is African American. We (African Americans) are proud and intelligent people. We understand what is going on and want change just like everybody else. We built this country owith the blood, sweat and tears of our ancestors. History dictates that we as a people have an even graeter interest in what is going to happen not just in this election, but for our future. I agreed with everything that this gentleman said and more. I hope that in the futire we continue to see more and more young people like him. Continue the struggle.
Gina Says:
February 19, 2008 at 10:54 pm
It is refreshing to see a young black man who knows what's going on around him, knows the issues and knows details about the candidates. I think this reporter looked at his appearance and expected something less than an intelligent exchange. Go Derrick!
Peggy Says:
February 19, 2008 at 11:04 pm
Derrick worked it out! The interviewere didn't know he was dealing with an informed citizen for Obama! Yeahhhhhhhhhh Derrick.
ELLE Says:
February 19, 2008 at 11:18 pm
Very engaging, well thought out comments. I enjoyed listening to this young man. The interviewer seemed to enjoy the dialogue.

His parents must be very proud of him! Go Derrick!!!
Cat Says:
February 19, 2008 at 11:45 pm
Although Derrick was talkative much like his candidate Obama, he had nothing effective to say. He didn't lay out Obama's health plan and it was never Obama's health plan to begin with. Every speech Obama gives is filled with "hope and adacity" blah blah blah. I can't believe so many people are so gullible when it comes to this guy. It's amazing and I'm wondering if they are really listening. It's much like watching a SEINFELD episode - a show about nothing.

People, you want change vote for a person with experience - Clinton has that - she's not the best candidate perhaps for some people but she is change. The Dems are all about change - Obama, unfortunately needs an education and should not be allowed to get one in the White House at our expense.
Brice Says:
February 20, 2008 at 12:42 am
Derrick, thank you for representing us and yourself with poise!
Obama is onto victory because of people like you dispelling the negative mythmakers–those that stand to gain from a divided populus.
Ohio and Texas are next!
Then through McCain and onto doing the people's work.
I am out.
Peace
terry Says:
February 20, 2008 at 12:47 am
awesome! awesome!

what people fail to realize is that we need change in American and unfortunately Clinton does not provide that. Romney said it best, just because you interned and the white house doesn't make you a president. Clinton is status quo. All the naysayers who are standing against Obama, are also standing with their heads in the sand. he is the person that will bring America back on its feet both at home and internationally. Clinton, is too polarizing and will divide this country further.

none of the candidates have a comprehensive plan on ANYTHING. It is foolish to think so, even more so to believe it. All they have is an outline, to do anything else would be foolhardy and open the campaign and themselves to potshots from the Republicans, competing candidates, economist, professors and all the OPINIONED media. get over yourself. they all blah, blah blah. The difference with Obama is, his Blah blah makes sense.
Letsmakeitwork Says:
February 20, 2008 at 2:16 am
A completely government funded health plan will not work! The plan has to contain an element of competition and has to incorporate the insured into the competition.

Barack represents me! I am funding him to further my own goals rather than some lobbyist's. Everyone who likes him should go to Obama's website and donate $25. That's all he asks. That keeps his skirts clean of special interests.

Kudos to Derrick. He makes me proud. The interviewer sort of sucked!

I don't want to listen to four years of Hillary's shrill voice telling me what I have to do. She gets on my nerves. I don't want to "have to" buy health insurance. I want someone to convince me to buy health insurance and make it a good deal for me.

Go Oboma!
Janet Says:
February 20, 2008 at 3:07 am
Derrick, I hope you are reading these comments. I just want to say, please become a activist/politian. We need people like you leading the world.
God has blessed you.
Always In Spirit,
Janet
ATL Says:
February 20, 2008 at 7:46 am
Derrick, good respresentation!!!

Obama he's the right man with the plan REAL TALK.

America stand up!!!
BARBARA BOX Says:
February 20, 2008 at 8:00 am
I PRAY PRES OBAMA IS SHOWN THIS…HE SHOULD REALIZE THAT HE IS GOD'S ORDAINED, CHOSEN VESSEL "FOR SUCH A TIME AS THIS"…HE REPRESENTS REGENERATION, A NEW ERA/ORDER AND GOD SHALL USE HIM MIGHTILY TO FULFILL HIS (GOD'S) DESIGN AND PLAN FOR OUR NATION IN YEARS TO COME… LET HIM KNOW HE NEED NOT BANTER WORDS WITH ANY OTHER SUPPOSED CANDIDATE, AND THAT HE SHOULD SPEAK FROM THE HEART AS THE HOLY SPIRIT LEADS…LET HIM KNOW HE SHOULD LISTEN TO THE STILL, SMALL VOICE WITHIN HIM WHICH WILL SPEAK THROUGH HIM TO THE EARS OF THOSE WHO HAVE EARS TO HEAR, AND THEY SHALL RECEIVE HIM…

I AM NOT A RELIGIOUS FANATIC….JUST SOMEONE THAT HAS RECIEVED DIVINE REVELATION REGARDING MR. OBAMA…REMAIN CIRCUMSPECT, MR. OBAMA AND WATCH WHAT OUR GOD WILL DO…! GOD BLESS YOU YOUNG MAN, AND REMAIN HUMBLE AND PRAISE GOD FOR HIS SOVERIGNTY IN YOUR LIFE!
TN Says:
February 20, 2008 at 10:02 am
Derrick, will you marry me?

LOL! No seriously, that was great representation for any candidate supporter, it was like you yourself were running for office. What a great way to show the world that we, the younger generation, are informed and that we aren't just running off emotions but facts as the media likes to portray.

Two thumbs up.
Jayne - Boca Raton, Florida Says:
February 20, 2008 at 10:27 am
I love when this kind of thing happens!
Reporter made an assumption - oops!!!
That is what is happening all over the country - people with pre-conceived notions of what an attractive African-American candidate who speaks "pretty" is about - will there be substance behind the words - and lo and behold!!!

THERE IS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

GO OBAMA

YES WE CAN!!!!!!! YES WE WILL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anonymous Says:
February 20, 2008 at 10:53 am
They picked the right one baby. The interviewer thought he was going to stump this young man. How the saying go you can't judge the book by it's cover. I think they thought they had an unlearned individual. But the interviewer soon found out that he was speaking to a very intelligent, eloquent speaker. Go Derrick props to you.
Angie - Buffalo, NY Says:
February 20, 2008 at 10:59 am
They picked the right one baby. The interviewer thought he was going to stump this young man. How the saying go you can't judge a book by it's cover. I think they thought they had an unlearned individual. But the interviewer soon found out that he was speaking to a very intelligent, eloquent speaker. Go Derrick props to you. People young and old are looking for change for the better.
Renee Gerideau Says:
February 20, 2008 at 11:12 am
Forgive me if I'm wrong. The interviewer picked the wrong person. He pre-judged him even before he walked up to him. I believe Derrick said it all. WE NEED A CHANGE. It's Time. Picking McCain is like picking Bush all over again.
A teacher Says:
February 20, 2008 at 11:17 am
Derrick, I will use your interview in my work with young people. You are a great example of why education is important. You're well read and very informed. I hope your interview wil inspire more of our young citizens to read the newspaper, watch the news and stay in school.

Great Job!!!! You make us proud.
Animal Mother Says:
February 20, 2008 at 11:44 am
Proud of this man today. The racist interviewer thought that by cutting him off and speaking over him he would intimidate him. AWESOME!
Brittany Somerset Says:
February 20, 2008 at 12:15 pm
I think I just fell in love with Derrick Ashong.
Southern Gal Says:
February 20, 2008 at 12:22 pm
This interviewer is not well informed himself. His questions sound like the rhetoric regurgitated on most morning news programs.

Go Derrick!
Valencia Says:
February 20, 2008 at 12:48 pm
That's what I'm talking about. Now there's goes a Great Debator
Victoria Says:
February 20, 2008 at 1:15 pm
What a lousy interviewer! He's asking questions of this person that should be directed to the candidates.

Wow! What a great response….and it shows that people who are backing Obama really do understand the difference….
Richard Wade Says:
February 20, 2008 at 1:15 pm
This young man was very impressive — the interviewer tried to ambush him but the interviewer picked the wrong one. I'm happy that the did this because it shows that Black folks (and some cases White) are not simply supporting Obama because he is Black and that you can't judge a book by its cover. I only wish that this interview was more widely publicized.
brittaney Says:
February 20, 2008 at 1:17 pm
Go Derrick!! I'm 100% the ignorant interviewer wasn't expecting this young brother to be so articulate and smart.
JuneB Says:
February 20, 2008 at 1:19 pm
Derrick You Are AWESOME! I Am So Proud Of You, I Wish You The Best.
Jacque Says:
February 20, 2008 at 1:29 pm
Thank you Derrick… Maybe now the Press/Billary Campaign and everyone else will finally see that although we are emotion, we are also SUBSTANCE!

Nice work… Sen. Obama will be very proud when he sees this!
bonniehanover Says:
February 20, 2008 at 2:11 pm
Derrick,
You are awesome! I should be half so eloquent and informed. You showed that rude interviewer the best OBAMA man EVER! And you kept your cool when he interrupted– JUST LIKE OUR MAN. YES! WE CAN! BEAUTIFUL, GREAT1.. CUTE TOO!
Gee Says:
February 20, 2008 at 2:15 pm
I noticed that some one listed his name as Derrick Ashong.
Derrick is very well spoken, articulate, knowledgeable, intelligent
(all of the above and more) and should be heard to a larger audience.
He would be very inspiring to our youth as well as adults.
I'm sure that some out there can direct him (Derrick) to the right people the make positve things happen for him and as a result inspire others.

Perhaps "Larry King" and such could get a copy of the Interview.

I feel Senator Obama would be proud-
Tracey Says:
February 20, 2008 at 2:18 pm
Please get a copy of this to Sen. Obama.
I'M SURE THAT HE WILL BE DELIGHTED.

GOBAMA, GOBAMA, GOBAMA!!!!!!!!!
Kay Says:
February 20, 2008 at 2:18 pm
Does this interviewer think this guy is Obama or what? I commend this guy for sticking with the interviewer.
Jacci Says:
February 20, 2008 at 2:51 pm
The strength of Obama as a candidate–and I hope our next president–is that he inspires thoughtful people of all ages to get engaged in the national discourse on making this country better. He can't do this alone, and I'm excited that such an amazing young man like Derrick gets what this is all about.

Obama is about more than speeches–HE really is in the SOLUTIONS BUSINESS!!!
Cobb Says:
February 20, 2008 at 4:10 pm
Well you know how Harvard liberals stick together….

Derrick N. Ashong (aka DNA) was born in Accra, Ghana in 1975 and raised in NY, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and NJ. A member of the Harvard Class of '97 , he graduated with high honors in Afro-American Studies and received a "Hoopes Prize" for his senior thesis – a musical exploring issues of identity for Africans & African-Americans. While a student he starred in Steven Spielberg's "Amistad," and has performed with such renowned artists as Janet Jackson, Bobby McFerrin, and Debby Allen. He has spoken on the influence of popular culture on youth identity at universities throughout the U.S., in Ghana and the Caribbean. Derrick is a co-founder and CEO of ASAFO Media LLC, a boutique music management company pioneering innovative approaches to the promotion and distribution of entertainment products, and a co-founder of the Sweet Mother Tour (SMT) a pioneering ASAFO project that harnesses the power of popular culture to present empowering images of African & Diasporan peoples. He is the author of "FREE THIS CD!!! – The FAM Manifesto," a text outlining the revolutionary potential of "open-source" music for the World of Music. Derrick was a guest speaker at WOMEX 2003 in Sevilla, Spain, addressing issues of global music licensing and distribution, and will be a guest speaker at WOMEX 2005 , addressing the potential of music as a tool in African development. A musician and producer, he recently released his 3 rd independent record, featuring music recorded in the US and West Africa. In addition to his work in the arts, Derrick has had a long involvement in political activism. He sits on the board of directors of the Fannie Lou Hamer project, a national non-profit addressing issues of Campaign Finance and Civil Rights and recently joined the board of Africa Action, the nation's oldest organization working on African affairs. He is a founding member of the Harvard Black Alumni Society. Currently Derrick is pursuing a PhD in African and African-American Studies and Ethnomusicology at Harvard. His research looks at the intersection of art, commerce and society in the global Music Industry. He is a recipient of a Paul & Daisy Soros Fellowship for New Americans.
Dr. Kool Says:
February 20, 2008 at 5:06 pm
Did you notice the young lady next to Derrick? She kept turning away at the end of the interview so that she wouldn't have to field those questions. Pretty smart, hey?
Cobb Says:
February 20, 2008 at 5:08 pm
Actually I thought she might be with him and have something of a higher profile and didn't want to be identified.
bones Says:
February 20, 2008 at 5:33 pm
wow, had to send this to family and friends…..wow
Baby Girl Says:
February 20, 2008 at 6:10 pm
Way to go Derrick. This man picked someone according to looks thinking he wouldn't know how to respond and it totally blew up in his face.
Way to go Derrick, I just wish I was as educated to respond in such a manner as you. Whatever you're doing keep it up and encourage more of our young men to do the same.
TLLE Says:
February 20, 2008 at 6:38 pm
I am proud of Mr. Derrick's interview. The reporter was shocked that young black male he picked was knowledgeable of the issues of the presidental debates. However, I am not shock because I know that we have well spoken, intelligent, bright African-American young men. They are the new leaders of America. Once again I'm proud of you Mr. Derrick keep up the GREAT WORK. I forward this video to all of my family members and friends. VOTE FOR CHANGE OBAMA 08′ GOD BLESSES. . . .
derrickfan Says:
February 20, 2008 at 7:33 pm
Derrick– You are a young man with a very bright future ahead of you. And an even brighter one once Sen. Obama is in the White House. You put a face and a name to the hope message being spread by Sen. Obama, and he ought to hire you for his team. Your eloquent, thoughtful response to a boorish hack spoke volumes about the divide in this country, and served to underscore the need for change and a commitment to bringing both sides to the table to solve the major issues of our time. Go Derrick!
Terry Says:
February 20, 2008 at 8:08 pm
I am pleasantly struck by Derrick's fluidity, despite the interviewer's apparent aggressive intent to "bring out the worse in his responses." I have seen other interviews where these "reporters of truth" make more allowances for less prepared interviewees to show a presumed inferiority propogated through history by ill-willed writers.

Good job , Derrick! I appreciated a lot of what you had to say!
Daniel Says:
February 20, 2008 at 9:25 pm
I was at the Obama rally in Houston last night and I was very impressed with his speech. It would be awesome if he could get all of the things that he addressed accomplished.

I'm a little embarrassed though. I thought that I was well-versed about a number of things, but Derrick has shown me that I'VE GOT SOME WORK AND SOME STUDYING TO DO!!! I consider myself quite intelligent but had that reporter asked me some of those questions, I may have been stumbling and stuttering and may have appeared uneducated, uninformed and downright ignorant.

I was interviewed after the rally in Houston by a program called "24/7″ and they asked me some basic questions and I feel that I answered them competently. I may have been dead meat had they brought up more specific policy questions which is why I won't be caught "sleeping" henceforth.

Barack Obama has envigorated many of the American people who had 'fallen asleep' in regard to the democratic process. Because of Barack Obama's early success in this campaign, many people have gotten excited about THE PROCESS POLITICS HAS BECOME POPULAR AMONGST THE MASSES!

Derrick's responses may actually be the beginning of what catapults Obama over the top because it articulates some of the specifics and gives us some perspective and a basis of why we might embrace Obama's philosophy over his adversaries.

His eloquence also brings to light that we (AFRICAN-AMERICANS) are still PSYCHOLOGICALLY AFFLICTED WITH AN INFERIORITY COMPLEX. We are still crippled by a state of mind such that we are still "AMAZED" and "SURPRISED" when WE are interviewed on camera and manage to actually speak INTELLIGENTLY. WHY DO WE SEE THAT AS THE EXCEPTION AND NOT THE RULE?

We can partially blame the "majority" and some news organizations that continually broadcast interviews of some of our less intelligent brothers and sisters and rarely show interviews like Derrick's. How do we break that vicious cycle? It will start with our children and BETTER SCHOOLS IN OUR COMMUNITIES which is one of the reasons why Obama appeals to so many voters…
T'anne Says:
February 20, 2008 at 9:34 pm
Good Interview and good response. While I am still out on whom I am going to vote for, simply because I need to get answers to some of my pressing issuses with the state of the nation, It is refreshing to see a young African American Male handle his business and know the business. We have to "many stereotypes" of what it is to be Black and to be a Black Male. Either being a rapper or incarcerated. How nice it is too see a young black Male educated and not afraid of what he knows and to say Hey I might go for McCain. You are not alone. I was rooting for Edwards but now I must choose from what is left. I too am a independent. A Black Woman, so guess what candidates you don't get my vote based on party affilation-don't have one but to myself, family and community–Oakland, Ca, Don't get my vote because we are the same color–ummmm let's see, separated by economics and you don't get my vote because I am a female-cause wrong again, The Women's movement basically impowered White Women not black or other minorities. However I plan to make the choice that best serves my indiviual and community needs as reflected through the nation. It is truly a telescope up close and far away…
WISDOM Says:
February 20, 2008 at 9:43 pm
Awesome. Just Awesome. You have represented the views of so many. It was a pleasure to hear real tangible solutions to problems that should and could have been solved years ago.

Ever thought about the "White House"? You have my vote.
Sylvia Says:
February 20, 2008 at 10:32 pm
Does anybody out there know the meaning of Barak Obama's name?
ISIS ENTERTAINMENT & PUBLISHING Says:
February 20, 2008 at 10:36 pm
Derrick has stated his position for Obama. It is simply amazing that the media (of all people. . . the pundits) do not understand and actually underestimate the intelligence and the power of the people.

McCain? Got a little loopy at the end, but Derrick stayed on message! We all need to stay on message and be ready to educate others who try to put words into the mouths of babes!
lllllllllllllll Says:
February 20, 2008 at 11:09 pm
I LOVE it!!!!

: )
Caryl Mussenden MD Says:
February 20, 2008 at 11:29 pm
As a physician who is current with what's happening in health care, I can only say "I THOUGHT I knew everything!" Derrick is well versed on the issues and can articulate them extremely well. He even understands the problems physicians face in this day and age. I feel like the person who wrote, "Derrick makes me want to read an encyclopedia or something." Thank you, Derrick. I feel proud to have someone of your ilk represent ME as an Obama supporter!!
TLLE Says:
February 20, 2008 at 11:45 pm
Barack Hussein Obama (What's in a name?)
By Adoyo
For those who wonder about the real significance of Senator Barack Obama's name:

Barack:

baraka: blessing (Kiswahili)
baraka: also berakhah , in Judaism, a blessing usually recited during a ceremony
baruch: Also related to "berakhah" or bracha (Hebrew: berakhot), which is a blessing.
baraka: also barakah, in Islam and Arab-influenced languages, meaning spiritual wisdom and blessing transmitted from God
"Baraka", a rarely used French slang term for luck, derived from the Arabic word
Baraka, aka Nigella sativa , a spice with purported health benefits
Hussein:

an Arabic name which is the diminutive of Hasan, meaning "beautiful" or "handsome".
Obama:

a Luo name (male) from Western Kenya (Nyanza Provice) which may derive from "obam," which conotes "bending" or "leaning".
also a surname in Japan and Equatorial Guinea
All told, Senator Obama seems to be a living embodiment of the name his parents gave him: he has lived a blessed life and seeks to share his blessing; he is beautiful to behold and to listen to - people are drawn to him and inspired when they hear him speak and consider his ideas; and in public life he is flexible and dedicated to leaning where necessary to help uplift others.

I examined my own name and found that it accurately indicates some of my innate tendancies. Curiously enough, both my Luo name and my English name mean the same thing: thoroughness, purification and wonder/curiosity (among other things…) - who'd have thunk? How about you? Do you embody your name's meaning?
Curtiss Says:
February 21, 2008 at 2:47 am
Getting away from the political debating a bit. I think that the subject line "Interviewer Picks the wrong Obama supporter to Railroad" is a bit misleading. It's seems pretty obvious that the videographer wanted to find a "technical Obama supporter, " hence the RE: why he uploaded the video to You Tube. Black people, Let's save our "race card" for police brutality and loan officers
Billie Says:
February 21, 2008 at 9:37 am
Derrick made me proud, I am a 58 year old female, and I have been waiting for this time. Our younger people are listiening, and they are aware that they have to be apart of this election, and change this is their future that is at stake. Obama stand for hope, change and a new future.
Ashley Says:
February 21, 2008 at 9:43 am
What an articulate young man! He makes me so proud of my generation!
April Says:
February 21, 2008 at 9:50 am
I am so glad the person interviewed was able to give the interviewer a run for is money. Many people think that Obama's supporters are mindless and emotionally driven. Although I am emotional ( excited, hopeful, energized and afraid) I do not make my political decisions based upon my feelings. Derrick was able to express his ideas and offer logical, well informed responses to the reporter's challenge. Yes, the reporter was challenging him -you could tell by his tone of voice and questioning method. Derrick …… your parents should be proud of you! Thanks.
Minnie E Miller Says:
February 21, 2008 at 10:07 am
Wonderful young man! Knows more than I do about health care and I'm an elder! The reporter continuely tried to trip him up, to no avail. Derrick is ready. I am so proud of Derrick!
Jone't Says:
February 21, 2008 at 10:22 am
Derrick wow

you inspired me being so young yet so informed
I am sure your parents must be proud. I only hope I am able to put half of what your parents put into you inot my sons.

1000 kudos
Ifeoma Says:
February 21, 2008 at 10:50 am
Impressive young man all round. Cobb, thanks for sharing his biography. As a Ghanaian-born student , entrepreneur, and activist, Derrick also shows how confident, integrated and adjusted many youth of African parentage are in America today. A role model for our children, including mine (of Nigerian parentage).
Dee Says:
February 21, 2008 at 10:52 am
Derrick, I agree with others who have said that you are AWESOME!

Although, I think J. Edwards would add value to a democratic ticket at this point. I haven't been to Clinton's website or any other candidate, but I hope that they actually do have a plan and moreover, a method of getting it implemented other than the status quo. No matter what they talk about, how are they going to get it done is the question I have.
Pauline Says:
February 21, 2008 at 11:16 am
PRAISE GOD FOR DERRICK!
Derrick has a heavy anointing on his life. It wasn't only Derrick's 'MOMENT', it was truly GOD's MOMENT. He's going places only old men can dream of going. WoW! Derrick's knowledge is wonderful but it's his humblness I'm amazed with. He is the answer to the mothers' prayers for their sons. American Be Aware Of Derrick; Another MOSES. Thank You Jesus!!
Bootsie Says:
February 21, 2008 at 11:32 am
Derrick for Vice President! That reporter didn't see Derrick coming, just like Hillary didn't see Barack coming back when all of this started. I believe that she thought she was a "shoe-in" as the democratic nominee. She got caught takin' a nap while Barack was creepin' up behind her. I am so ready for CHANGE! I believe our best hope for that is Obama in "08. God be with him and his family.
Christine Says:
February 21, 2008 at 11:43 am
Derrick handled the interview exceptionally well. However, I don't agree with many comments above that write off the journalist/interviewer as "racist" or out to find a black supporter to discredit. I think he was trying to pin Derrick down and at times play "devil's advocate" to see how well Derrick could justify his points at narrower and narrower degrees of specificity. In the process, he did come across as rude in his interruptions, and I think it was because he wanted to control the discussion to see how far he could push Derrick on an issue.

I believe interviewer did it to see if an Obama supporter could indeed justify his/her support with intellectual thought, an analytical mind, facts and figures–since Obama supporters have been stereotyped in this campaign as being driven by blind adoration and emotions. I'm black myself, and I don't think it has anything to do with race, but perhaps I view things with a different paradigm than many others.
renee Says:
February 21, 2008 at 11:48 am
I ABSOLUTLEY LOVE THIS! THIS REPORTER HAS CHARGED UP THE WRONG INTELLIGENT YOUNG MAN.GREAT JOB DERRICK!
Sha Donaldson Says:
February 21, 2008 at 12:12 pm
Right on Derrick, I am a black female who can justify the fact that Obama is the better candidate. I believe the interview was not expecting Derrick to come across as he did. A very intelligent brother with knowledge about important issues and concerns this country is dealing with since Bush became President. What a mess!!
Rachel Lassiter-Rideoutt Says:
February 21, 2008 at 12:32 pm
Derrick i'm so proud!!! This video is spreading like wildfire. It's a true testament that youth and moreover African American males are engaged in the election process and aware of the policies on the table. You spoke so eloquently on the fly… If only our current president Mr. GW Bush could speak this well!!!
Semone Says:
February 21, 2008 at 12:47 pm
WOW. What a smart young man. Derrick…you did us…and your father (who is a pediatrician) PROUD. Yes….the fact is that young, Black people are about the issues, and want who they feel is the BEST candidate…irrespective of the race of the candidate.
Sarjo Says:
February 21, 2008 at 1:06 pm
Derrick for Youth America VP!
Gail Cox Says:
February 21, 2008 at 1:30 pm
WOW! You make me so proud.
Clinton and Obama - Page 93 - Fires of Heaven Guild Message Board Says:
February 21, 2008 at 1:36 pm
[…] Interviewer picks wrong Obama supporter to mess with Obama Supporter Video […]
Candi Says:
February 21, 2008 at 3:25 pm
I am sooo proud of Derrick! It seems like the reporter was trying to set him up for failure…didn't work this time!! Derrick showed him he is nobody's dummy. I'm voting for Derrick!!!
C Johnson Says:
February 21, 2008 at 3:28 pm
Derrick, is one of the most articulate young americans to speak on Obama. He answered the questions thrown at him as if there was nothing to it. He spoke well and with acknowledge about what Obama stands for. Keep up the good work Derrick, you make up proud.
C Johnson Says:
February 21, 2008 at 3:29 pm
Very well spoken and articulate. Was not flusterd by the reporters questions.
Derrick Finch, D.M.A Says:
February 21, 2008 at 3:50 pm
There is something to the name, gender, ethnicity, education, genetics, awareness and nurturing surroundings. All of these elements shows there is a new understanding of who can and does do verses the common stereotypes. It is a pleasure to see Derrick and the reporter sharing collectively. The prescience is there are more Derricks to come.

Sincerely,
Derrick Finch, D.M.A.
Jazz Musician
American Classical Music
Mansour Ansari Says:
February 21, 2008 at 3:58 pm
Both guys did their job. Derrick excelled because he did not get frustrated and emotional at the 'Repubiican-inspired' questions. Instead he laid it out that Obama has the DNA to bring partisans together better than others. If he represents a voting block of concerned and educated young people, this is the time to move the nation forward.
Regina Says:
February 21, 2008 at 4:00 pm
It seems very obvious that this reported did not expect to get answers to his questions. He was very rude and went from question to question as though he wanted to find an area that this yound man could not speak on. My compliments to the Young man because he is a very informed individual and was very poised even during this form of intergation.
kevin Says:
February 21, 2008 at 4:25 pm
Its refreshing to se an image of an afrtican-american man that rings truer to my own experience with black men as educated, articulate and engaged citizens. I suppose images like this may be a bit more unnerving for some than the images that are typically portrayed.
keith Says:
February 21, 2008 at 4:39 pm
anyone who does not realize this was all a setup is an idiot.
Hillary did it with her questions from audience members and also with the hecklers.
Now its obamas turn to use the set up.
Paula Says:
February 21, 2008 at 4:47 pm
I want Derrick to marry my daughter.
sheridan b Says:
February 21, 2008 at 5:40 pm
it pays to be informed,maybe he should run.
Centaurman Says:
February 21, 2008 at 6:30 pm
Deerrick, you are right on! Your words echo the sentiment of the (silent) majority in America and throughout the world. Obama, is my man and wants to unite, not divide the country. It should not matter what your color is, your politics, your age or income bracket. The message that Senator Obama brings to the table is this, "We are all Americans, we must make our representatives in Congress make a better world for all of us across party lines. I hope to see one party, the peoples party. After he is elected, he will need all of our help to make Congress act for the greater good of all the people and not simple pander to special interests and others at the expense of the rest of the nations.
L. Lyles Says:
February 21, 2008 at 6:42 pm
Way to go Derrick. Hope you're getting all the acalades from this great interview. And I'm sure I don't have to tell you to drop the pessamistic comments in the trash where the minds of those those making the remarks should be. LL
thines01 Says:
February 21, 2008 at 6:49 pm
This is fantastic. It's great to see some educated young folks voice their opinion. I'm a Republican, so I'm really confused right now. McCain and Clinton don't seem like choices to me.
Anonymous Says:
February 21, 2008 at 6:50 pm
DERRICK FOR PRESIDENT!
Anonymous Says:
February 21, 2008 at 6:50 pm
DERRICK FOR PRESIDENT!
Pat H Says:
February 21, 2008 at 9:42 pm
I think that they did pick the right person to talk to because it just goes back to the old saying that you can not judge a book by the cover.And that young people are concerned about what is going on in the world today.This was a great interview!
blkmanforhillary Says:
February 21, 2008 at 10:57 pm
His dad is a pediatrician… Enough said.
HOWE SIMMONS Says:
February 21, 2008 at 11:43 pm
I THINK IT WOULD BE INTERESTING TO SEE HIM WIN JUST FOR THE REACTION OFTHE PUBLIC
taylor Says:
February 21, 2008 at 11:50 pm
duuuuu
blkmanforhillary Says:
February 22, 2008 at 12:48 am
Why have people picked up that the interviewer had a motive?

I didn't get that. I got that he was quick and tried to get snappy answers and tried to challenge the interviewee. And some responses here even state that the guy was racist - for Godsake, we don't even know his race - - LOL

I think it's our own expectations that make this occurence something phenomenal. But this is - or should be - very normal. A young black man should be able to speak with eloquence. If we expect that this is the norm it will be the norm.
Lady C Says:
February 22, 2008 at 1:55 am
Right On Brotha!……….Now loose the gum.
Vivian in VB Says:
February 22, 2008 at 8:22 am
The reporter was banking on the stereotypical shallow response from a black male but what he got instead was a position substantiated by intellectual reasoning and serious consideration of all candidates. Derrick not only "broke the mold" that the reporter was used to but he also noted that he came from a family of educated men…with his father being a pediatrician. The questions didn't make Derrick uncomfortable, as the reporter had hoped, it actually excited Derrick to have a chance to voice his support. God definitely orchestrated this teachable moment for the reporter. KUDOS TO DERRICK!
M.D. Ward Says:
February 22, 2008 at 8:51 am
It surely pays to have an education, and do your homework. Whoever said "if you don't want black people to know something, put it in a book" was not wise enough to plan for the future and young adults like Derrick. Thank GOD for parents who raise their children to think, read, get educated, and fear not the "man" who will challenge you !!!! APPLAUSE, APPLAUSE, APPLAUSE TO DERRICK. He could be our NEXT BLACK PRESIDENT !!!! (in 8 years or so) KUDOS INDEED TO DERRICK !!! and KUDOS to his dad the pediatrician in rearing such a dynamic man child. A fine specimen of a "role model." DON'T SLEEP !!!!!! (I love it)
vboy Says:
February 22, 2008 at 9:06 am
Anyone notice that the entertainment value of this is not unlike the underlying reason Ali G is so brilliant: it plays off people's smug assumptions about Black / young culture. You can hear the dripping superiority in the interviewers' approach, and basically Derrick runs intellectual circles around him. Wish the entire Left was as well informed as Derrick, we wouldn't come off as such mush heads half the time.
SaMeeB Says:
February 22, 2008 at 10:37 am
Hey Derrick!

I dont know you. but you represent us WELL!!
kay Says:
February 22, 2008 at 10:39 am
Cute and Smart!! lol
Sharron Says:
February 22, 2008 at 11:04 am
Very intelligent brother. I am proud of him.
Mario Says:
February 22, 2008 at 11:17 am
Let it be known that I said it first. Mr. "O" can do it all with one finger than Mr. "B"the "could……do with 8 years in !!!!!!!!! Really "Cain"
TEXASLADY Says:
February 22, 2008 at 11:29 am
blkman ARE YOU CERTAIN YOU'RE BLACK, REALITY CHECK NEEDED???? It was obvious by voice and questions duh!